Posted By Sean Fraser
Paul,
I recall that the DSS had identified the exact opposite - they believed that by having a physical barrier between the client and the advisor, they were subconciously reinforcing the image of a distant uncaring government that demeans people and would therefore be more likely to trigger violent responses in frustrated or bewildered clients, thereby increasing the demand by staff for more extreme conditions which then created further negative impressions, and down the spiral goes. Also, by boxing in staff and keeping them separate from clients, they created a perception that every client was a danger and this in turn created a beleagured mentality - there but for the grace of God go I. Instead, they wanted scrap the barriers and open out the layout and create a more welcoming, civilised environment where, by not treating every client as a potential criminal, they would make violent behaviour much less acceptable and hence a rarer occurrence that become more self-limiting. The practical application of psychology.
Unfortunately, this doesn't help those who are on the front line and in danger of a violent attack right now.
A tricky issue. Preferably, I would consider effective training for all staff in anger management techniques (over and above customer service training), so they can spot the danger signs early on and to calm a situation before it gets out of hand. I would also suggest a good support system where if they signal for assistance, it is provided. I'm not sure what the legal stance would be on providing training in restraining violent persons - although I would advocate it, there are increased dangers of litigous claims and possible criminal charges (he hit me! said the aggrieved armed robber) so check with your insurer first, 'cos if they ain't happy perhaps you shouldn't do it.
The staff need the right training to identify the warning signs and deal with them effecitvely, but they must have the assurance that if they need support, it will be provided immediately. The message needs to be made with the client that violence is completely unacceptable as a negotiating tool.
Also, I would endorse prosecution of ALL violent attackers - again, reinforce the message.
I'm not sure of the outcome of the DSS story. Perhaps the TUC can help you - it was probably UNISON or prehaps Amicus that was involved. I do know that our Manpower offices in Aberdeen are all open plan and ordinary desks, with use of dedicated computer terminals to allow for job searches etc.. Clean, bright - and most of all, non-threatening.
Probably doesn't help you with your original question, but anyway . . .