Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 October 2003 07:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cheeseman
I work in a R&D department and we are currently reviewing our COSHH Risk Assessment Procedures. The people who work in the building are all professionally qualified chemists.There is a dislike of the use of Risk Phrases to describe chemical risks (as used in COSHH Essentials)People think that words such as Toxic, Harmful and irrritant are much more useful in describing the chemical hazard.
There is a policy that all substances hazardous to health are handled in Fume cupboards which are regularly tested and maintained.
The analytical section has problems undertaking extensive risk assessments on indervidual chemicals because of the number and varity of samples that are submitted for analysis. Does anyone have information or examples of COSHH Risk assessments that that they could send me that are used in a similar reaserch environment? Of particular use would be Risk assessments that are used in analytical labs.
Any advice would be welcome.
Regards
Barry
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 October 2003 09:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Barry

COSHH assessments should be process or operation based (dilution of acids, pipetting, etc.). Of course, the hazards of the materials must be considered as part of the assessment but you need to think about how you are using them and in what quantities. Concentrated sulphuric acid is undoubtedly hazardous but the risks of using 5 ml at a time on a laboratory bench are very different from using it a tonne at a time in a production environment.

I am a chemist, safety adviser and occupational hygienist; if you want further discussion, contact me off list.

Paul
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 October 2003 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi
Can you not list this vast numbers simply under 3 main "risk" categories (after a conducting a basic first stage COSHH assessment) into Low, Medium & High Risk. In all likelihood, it may be possible to control riks of the "low risk" ones through generic information as you have trained chemists. Then you need a higher degree of control for the "medium risk" and the most comprehensive for the "high risk".
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.