Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 November 2003 12:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker I’ve come up against some old-ish milling machines and lathes and need advice about current best practice. Although I’ve some recent experiences with newer machinery, I’m not sure about what is OK with older stuff. The lathes are fitted with hinged chuck guards, but should these be interlocked with the lathe motor? What is the current thinking regarding lead screws and feed shafts (rotating parts) is it still considered sufficient that the overhang from the bed way offers protection. The milling machines (Bridgeport style) have guards (more to contain ejections than anything, I think) but there is no interlocking to prevent exposure to rotating parts other than the operative conforming to work practices
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 November 2003 13:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pat Burns MIOSH - SpDipEM - AMIQA Jim Sent on e-mail for you on this.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 November 2003 13:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Stone Jim Following a visit by the HSE a few years ago we have interlocked all our chuck guards. The lead screw was mentioned and we have been trialing different types of movable guards but cannot find anything as yet that moves freely AND stops swarth clogging up the screw. If you want to chat more about this please email me direct Ian
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 November 2003 14:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Baynes Most of our machines were aquired via an expansion grant in 1973. We have fitted interlocked chuck guards to the lathes and interlocked table edge guards to all our milling machines. Additionally, we trialled leadscrew guards which were rubber sheet roller blinds. These were supposed to act as deflectors to prevent accidental entrapment of clothing. They worked until the containers were run into the end of the lathe, trapping the blind material. We have had to remove them. We have some Bridgeport machines which give us more problems than the other machines. The table edge guards, if high enough to be effective, interfere with the ability of these machines to be used like a pillar drill - guards with removeable sections to allow this to continue are available. Some Bridgeport machines have unguarded, letter box sized slots on each side of the head to allow the belt to be moved to different pulleys and hence give various speeds. We made hinged guards, not interlocked but arranged so that only authorised, trained personnel could open them. I suspect that marking of controls, type of start and stop buttons may not meet current regs. I do not know what your working environment is, we are a college of further education, industrial use may be a different kettle of fish. Hope this helps.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.