Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 December 2003 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlanB
I have been asked a question by a colleague, and I think I know the answer, but I want to make sure of my facts first. The question is:

We have a fencing job that needs to be done in a remote location. There are no working activities there, only old abandoned mine shafts. We want to fence these shafts to make them secure. The fencing job will not result in any persons, other than those fencing, at risk of injury. My colleague has a contractor lined up to do the work. The contractor is a small company (only 2 employees - 2 brothers). The contractor has today informed my colleague that they do not have employers liability insurance or public liability insurance.

Is it a legal requirement for them to hold these insurance documents? Can we contract the work out to them from a legal perspective (even if the moral practice is not sound)? Can the contractor work under our insurances?

Thanks.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 December 2003 15:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Geoff Burt
My colleague has a contractor lined up to do the work. The contractor is a small company (only 2 employees - 2 brothers). The contractor has today informed my colleague that they do not have employers liability insurance or public liability insurance.

Is it a legal requirement for them to hold these insurance documents?

Yes.

Can we contract the work out to them from a legal perspective (even if the moral practice is not sound)?

No.

Can the contractor work under our insurances?

Yes, if you admit them to the insurance company and they agree, preferably in writing.

It would be a very brave person who can say your contractors and others affected by their activities are not at risk! And not at all borne out by the statistics of contractor accidents.

Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 December 2003 15:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Alan,

Know this might not help mate but should you really be contemplating using a company who does not have any insurance at all which protects themselves and any other third party in the event off? Think this says a lot about the way they operate.

If they fall under your 'umbrella' if anything goes wrong who picks up the 'insurance cost' etc.

Personally I would contact your insurance company for guidance as they will be the ones who will take the 'insurance' risk.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 December 2003 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlanB
As I said, I know the answer, it is just that I needed some backing up so I can present the information to my colleague. He was carrying out routine contractor meeting and when he asked for copies of the insurance documents they admitted to having none.

I did not know prior to his query of his intention to bring these contractors in, and I told him immediately that he can not be using them.

I just wanted some further educated backup to support my stance.

Thank you for your contribution.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 December 2003 16:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie
There is an exemption from having employers liability insurance for family businesses that only employ close family members (this does not apply if a limited company has been formed). A free guidance document is available via the HSE web site > free leaflets.

I am also not sure that public liabilty insurance is a legal requirement, but only a fool would be in business without it.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 04 December 2003 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Jarman
Martyn is correct in his comments regarding employers liability insurance. It is not a legal requirement to have public liability insurance although I agree with the other respondees that it may be unwise to appoint contractors who do not have insurance cover.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 04 December 2003 09:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor
So how do you convince the HSE and others that you have engaged competent contractors? If they have no insurance, I doubt if you will be able to obtain many references from previous clients. For working at and preventing access to mineshafts, I would expect a minimum of £5m public liability cover.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 04 December 2003 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie
I have run my own business for the last three and a half years and although I have all relevant insurance policies in place, I have yet to be asked by a client to produce evidence of cover.

Competence does not directly relate to having insurance cover. An incompetent person could get insurance without difficulty until claims arise and the insurer has to start paying out.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 04 December 2003 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlanB
Martyn,

Competence is nothing to do with having or not having insurance, and I don't think that this thread has suggested that. The importance of insurance is that if anything does go worng, the contractor has backup for any action that may come as a consequence.

My concern at companies not having insurances is that they are chancers. They chance not having insurance, which means that they may well chance on their safety paperwork, whcih means they may well be chancers whilst working. If they chance whilst working, they are putting themselves and others at risk.

Of course, it may be that they can't, or can not afford to get insurance, which means that they either have a poor track record, or their line of work is regarded as being hazardous, which means they are at greater risk of having problems, which means they then need insurance more than anyone!!

If I'm wrong, then please correct me!

Alan
Admin  
#10 Posted : 04 December 2003 15:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie
Alan,

My comment about insurance/ competence was in relation to the comment made by Ken.

I agree with the comments made in your last contribution
Admin  
#11 Posted : 04 December 2003 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor
I agree with Alan too. This is the sort of point I was trying to make in my hasty fashion. The HSE and others advise that clients should seek to engage safe and competent contractors by asking the right questions, getting appropriate information, etc. We always require evidence of public liability insurance when engaging contractors as well as satisfying ourselves as to their health and safety performance. From the information supplied, I rather doubt that this company would be able to provide such an assurance - including valid references.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 04 December 2003 16:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlanB
You're right Martyn. My appologies. I have just committed a cardinal sin of a safety professional - I read, I din't digest, and I ASSUMED!!

Oops!

Alan
Admin  
#13 Posted : 06 December 2003 08:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Singleton BSc
On a completely different note, if you are woried about the chancers, have you asked them for a copy of their safe systems of work, method statements and safety policy, whislt I know they don't need the last one, if they cannot be supplied and they don't have insurance, I guess Mr. Insurance man would be knocking at your door for his pound of flesh should something go wrong, as you have employed them as contractors.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.