Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 December 2003 14:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Sandler
Dear all,
Question asked at a safety meeting yesterday by the HSE to a group of safety officer.

Your job title is health and safety, how many of you here (60 approx) look after the health of the staff?

The HSE are refering to Occ Health, good point.

Should we be called 'safety officer's'? or health and safety officer/advisor's/....

Should we be looking for a qualification in Occ Health on top of the Safety qual's we or may not have.

MSc in management of health and safety looks at how to manage H&S, NVQ looks at practicle applications to do the job of a safety officer not a health and safety officer.

Should membership of IOSH be based on safety or health and safety dependant on quals?

Just a thought.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 December 2003 14:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason
Jonathan,
Have you read the IOSH guidance "professionals in partnership", available right here on the IOSH site?

http://www.iosh.co.uk/fi...profsinpartnership%2Epdf

It is a good account of the relationship between occupational health and occupational safety.

Personally I find the boundaries and interfaces between H&S and OH pretty clear. OH professionals are medical staff - OH physicians and OH nurses - and whilst H&S advisers do deal with health issues up to a point, it tends to be clear when an issue becomes a medical matter.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 12 December 2003 08:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Geoff Burt
Agree with Diane there is a clear distinction between the two.

But H&S advisors/consultants (why the name H&S officer is still in existence beats me - it should, at the latest, have gone out of the window with the introduction of the H&SWA) do have a health, albeit lower profile role.

One simple example of the role is DSE assessments. You provide advice during the assessment to try to avoid future health problems. If problems are currently being experienced you refer the case for medical attention.

Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 December 2003 12:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Shane Johnston
I have the title "Occupational Risk Adviser", and I advise on Health and Safety if I am competent to do so. Title has nothing to do with it ... it's the job you do, and what you are competent in.

Most "Safety" practitioners I know advise on COSHH to some degree, in which the emphasis is on "Health". LEV, gloves, RPE etc are all used to minimise the impact on an individuals health.

Shane



Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 December 2003 18:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Craythorne
Many moons ago I studied for the old NEBOSH Diploma and one of the modules was 'Occupational Health and Hygiene'.

In addition, having dealt with issues involving hazardous substances, ergonomics and WRULD's etc. over the years then I fail to see why the word 'Health' should be dropped from the job title. Any practitioner who focuses solely on employee safety with a disregard to health issues is not doing their job correctly.

Paul Craythorne
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 December 2003 15:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gavin Gibson
Jonathan

In my time I have been a company safety advisor, principle health and safety officer, safety manager, safety systems manager, HSE manager, etc - the job rarely changes - what's important is what you actually do!

Regards

Gavin Gibson
Admin  
#7 Posted : 18 December 2003 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brian Jenkins
One of the best bits of advice that I read (I think on these pages), is to stop explaining to people that we work in such a way because of safety, but to explain that it will benefit their health. If you use the word safety to someone, it has connotations of legal bureaucracy and they sometimes ‘switch off’. You express that you do things to prolong their health, then they 'sometimes' listen. I tend to agree that the name is not important; we are all striving for the same outcome – aren’t we?
Brian.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 19 December 2003 10:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Bower
With the apparent continuing slating of H&S in the press I'm thinking of changing my job title to the 'make sure you go home unaffected by work activities person'.

It sort of reflects what I try and achieve!!

Stuart
Admin  
#9 Posted : 19 December 2003 10:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Donna Fisken
In Scotland, there is a scheme run by the Scottish Executive called Scotland's Health at Work - the aim is to encourage and reward employers in their efforts to improve the health of their workforce and to build a healthy workplace and a healthy organisation.

This is done by providing workplaces with an infrastructure to address health issues. Although based in Scotland we have included our London office in the activities and information provided. This is the second time I have taken an organisation through this scheme and it can be done with very little expenditure.

Currently there are 972 participating workplaces, 657 of which are Small/Medium Enterprises of less than 100 staff (employing over 638,000 people) 26% of the Scottish workforce. The majority of offshore platforms in the North Sea are involved in this scheme.

I don't know if there is a similar scheme south of the border but if anyone would like anymore information feel free to give me a shout.

Regards - Donna
Admin  
#10 Posted : 19 December 2003 18:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
A french safety organisation surveyed it's membership and came up with 127 different titles for what I call HSE advisor. (E = environment) There are probably that many in the UK. My first job title was Risk Management Coordinator. I suggested 'Risk Manager" but was told I was getting a bit above myself.

Health has always been part of my job - monitoring of heat, light, noise, air, earth, fire, and water. Environment, stress and ergonomics came in their time as did food hygiene through HACCP. Tobbaco, (i've tried 3 different spellings for that and they all look rite) alcohol and healthy eating show up every now and then.

Health and Safety advisor is the best job title (and job) that I know of.

Haven't met a safety OFFICER for some years, and didn't think much of the ones I did meet.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 December 2003 21:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Jonathan,

It is an interesting observation and no doubt many in the industry have at some time or other wondered what a job title actually entails. To some extent the term advisor, officer, consultant etc is entwinned in semantics. Perhaps IOSH should create a generic profile that could be defined and adopted within the industry.

A slightly different slant on your theme to which some have alluded to, the specialist nature of health, safety and environmental issues. Not so long ago when H&S was a 'cottage industry' the term used was irrevalant. Nowdays there are far more specialist fields such as stress advisor (remember, we played golf with one). My point is, that in the future there may be a need for a health advisor (not a hygeinist), just as there are environmental advisors, risk assessors, auditors etc.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.