Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 29 December 2003 21:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Miller Having just had the introduction of mobile phone restrictions whilst driving (which I fully endorse)I have just within hours encountered a cyclist on a very dark road, wobble in front of me and then cut across my path. No lights in sight and seemed totaly oblivious to my presence. The reason I suspect is that he was using a mobile phone with one hand whilst trying to steer with the other. I blew my horn to warn him of my presence but he just jesticulated with the hand that was steering with! Why is it that yet again the lycra louts get away with it. No tax, No insurance to speak of, No sense of responsability and no copper in site. They ride on pavements, jump traffic lights and terrorise the pedesrian. Two weeks ago I was sitting at a 4 way light controlled crossing on a red light and behind me but one was a police car. Cyclist rode straight past through the lights on red and the police took no notice. Can you imagine the uproar if you were to collide with one of these people. Who would pay for the damage? I am probably upsetting the many by slagging off the few but one has to ask, when will the government tax and legislate against these people instead of giving them more road space to cause mahem. Road safety! what a laugh!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 29 December 2003 22:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Mike Parking on pavements, not stopping at amber traffic signals, ignoring box junctions, turning right despite 'no right turn' signs, stopping across pedestrian crossings when in traffic (and then being stuck there when the lights change), etc., etc. Motorists heal thyselves! Paul
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 December 2003 12:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bryn Maidment Watch out! Handbags at dawn! Both are as bad as each other but more cars equals more inconsiderate car drivers than cyclists. Just get a motorcycle and life will get more exciting. Now! about those Revenue / Speed cameras....
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 December 2003 13:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Ouch!!! Never seen a cyclist or a motorcyclist come off better when coming into contact with a car/bus/lorry etc. My mate has just failed his bike test because the tester said he wasn't riding his bike fast enough in the rain to overtake!!?? Flabbergasted was his polite comment.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 December 2003 17:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen J W Clegg. On Wednesday last week, I saw a really big bloke on a push bike with a bushy white beard that was clearly blocking his view of the road, not only that, the two huge sacks strapped to his handlebars were obviously causing his bike to wobble! Did the police do anything???? NO! There's no justice in the world!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 December 2003 17:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Mike, Having cycled over 3000 miles this year which includes the UK end to end route in seven days, I think I am sufficiently competent to answer some of the points that you raised in your original statement. No tax, wrong we pay income tax, national insurance, VAT on the cycles and our lycra and we even pay road tax on our cars, however we cannot pay much tax on our fuel as most food items are exempt from VAT. No insurance, wrong many serious cyclists automatically have third party insurance (which we also pay tax on). Mine comes courtesy of my CTC membership. Pavements, I try and avoid these wherever I can; unfortunately local authorities do seem to think that it is a good idea to put cycle routes across some of these. Lights, yes I use these in the dark. Mobile phones, yes I will stop to answer one of these in order that the other person does not hear any heavy breathing. Helmets, before anyone asks, yes I do wear one. There are defensive cycling techniques which we now used on roads protect ourselves; unfortunately most car users don’t seem to understand this principle yet. Unfortunately many other vehicle users don’t give us a wide berth when passing us, they quite happily pull out immediately in front of us when we are moving above twenty miles per hour and frequently try and turn left across the front of us. In the UK there are probably more cycles than there are cars; unfortunately most of them are not used. Mike for the New Year, why don’t you get your old bike out of the shed and try and join me. You might even find that you enjoy cycling!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 December 2003 18:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Miller So was it safe to use a mobile phone whilst riding a bike then? I realised that this would rattle a few cages but I was not prepared for the rush to defend the cyclist. As for insurance I was advocating (compulsory insurance) something that will pay up when a cyclist slams into your car hopping from one pavement to another at a junction with a curry on the handlebars. As happened to my son several years ago. Again no lights and Over £500 worth of damange to the car and all the cyclist was worried about was the curry. I agree there are bad car/bus and lorry drivers too. But they are governed by laws that prosecute dangerous driving and insurance that compensates the injured party. Not so in the case of the cyclist. I realise that the bicycle is a green mode of transport and has its place. However all I was stating is that it should be better regulated. Wait for the next subject: The school run! Notice how quiet the roads are last few weeks?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 December 2003 19:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Mike, I think the probability of your son’s car being hit by an uninsured motor vehicle is now much greater than an uninsured cycle. I think that I have heard somewhere that there are some parts of the country where one in ten cars are probably uninsured. Cyclists are also governed by the same laws on our roads and yes we can also get points on our driving licences from cycling offences. Compulsory insurance for cycles, surly that would need a whole raft of new legislation to get all those millions of bicycles resting in our sheds and garages registered? When you pass me in the New Year, will you give me more room?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 30 December 2003 22:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Miller I'll probably have to they will all be riding 3 abreast. Happy new year bud and stop taking it all too serious.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 31 December 2003 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith Mike, I suspect the person on the bicycle that hit your son’s car was not wearing Lycra otherwise he may well have been insured. Cycling is probably one of the best ways of losing all that excess seasonal weight. If I appear to be taking the cycling argument seriously, I just felt that someone needed to come out and defend the cycling point of view for a balanced debate on your original statement. I am now looking forward to seeing you join me on my training rides and you might discover that even enjoy it! If you start training now, what time do you think that you can do a half century ride in by June? PS. I know of good place for buying cheap Lycra.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 31 December 2003 14:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Abbott My BRAND NEW Rover MG was hit yesterday, by a cyclist, who tried to get through a gap that was just wide enough - just wide enough in fact, for hit to crash into my electric / heated/ EXPENSIVE wing mirror (removing it nicely), and leave a 2' - 2mm scratch down the right side of my car...! Oh.. I was waiting at a traffic light at the time. Fortunately the car to my right suffered even worse damage as the cyclist fell across the bonnet! Thank god it was a police car! :'( <--- £1,000 + damage for ME! Bah!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 02 January 2004 20:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robin V Boughton As a motorist of some 35yrs experience and as a keen cyclist too I can see both sides of this discussion. I adopt defensive techniques when both driving and cycling on our busy roads. My guiding principle is that I must think for myself and for the other drivers around me. On average only one in four drivers is totally concentrating on driving, if you doubt this just stand on a pavement and watch passing vehicles!!!! Whilst there are faults on both sides in terms of bad road craft behaviour, in my considered opinion a large minority of vehicle drivers have very little regard for cyclists and pedestrians for that matter.They drive very efficient killing machines without regard to other road users!!! A Safe New Year to All Road Users
Admin  
#13 Posted : 03 January 2004 09:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd There's european legislation coming out soon that means that the cyclist is covered by the car drivers insurance. ie: In the event of an accident the car driver pays whether or not he/she was responsible. That's that over with. In reality, many cyclists are covered by their household insurance if not by specific policies. So, if your car is damaged you should claim against the cyclist. Even if the cyclist is killed, you may still be able to claim ! (it'll save your no-claims if you have not got NC protection) While I have read the posts proclaiming that many cyclists have similar insurance to cars, they haven't. Many cyclists are just an accident waiting to happen anyway. Children in particular. I was at a road junction waiting to pull out..look left, look right, look everywhere....still not enough to overcome the inherent suicidal tendencies of the lycra-clad pillock on the racing cycle who came on my OFFSIDE and turned across my front to go left....fortunately, it was the coming lorry that nearly minced him and not me. As for drivers taking no care....I'm a 30-year motorcycle driver with over half a million miles and no self-blame accidents, and a car driver. Now, how did I know the cyclist riding (illegally) on the footpath in front of me was going to get off the footpath and go straight across the road without looking ? Experience. It happens often.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 04 January 2004 21:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Miller Thanks John for that well ballanced view! I will put my point in a more direct fashion!For those who missed the point. Is is legal for a push bike rider to use a mobile phone whilst riding on a public road? If so do you think that it is safe to do so? Do you not need more consentration to ride a bicycle on a public road if it is so dangerous (as others have quite rightly pointed out) Have they slipped through the net of the new legislation? The same questions apply to walkman radio's or anything with earplugs for that matter. Thanks for the debate Mike
Admin  
#15 Posted : 04 January 2004 21:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd I wouldn't call my viewpoint balanced, well or ill. Just life-experience. As for using a mobile phone while cycling; no, it isn't legal. Cyclists can be prosecuted the same as motorists. They have to cycle safely ! I was reminded of that little fact when driving home this morning.....and having to drive at about 20 mph for 5 minutes while I waited for the organised road-race to look behind and see me. Even then I got a single digit response from one of said lycra-clad athletes. I also have memories of a queue of traffic on the A1 dual carriageway one summer...the A1 was contraflow because of roadworks...single lane use on the other carriageway...the "Q" was because of the cycle race proceeding down one lane...What ever happened to sanity ? (the same as "what ever happened to lights at night" ?) As for cyclists paying tax as well, ok. But then vehicle drivers pay two lots. So, all cycles should be registered and then a small fee can be charged for that, at least.Which should cut thefts. No problem. Maybe they'll use the cycle paths which this fair town has paid to construct. As if.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.