Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 12 March 2004 19:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By thomas mark evans Hi everybody Please give me your thoughts, i have staff who fitted plasterboard which it turns out contains asbestos (chrysotile). All staff are to have medicals the BUPA doctor has said they do not require x-rays unless he decides to give them after listening to their chests. My immediate thought was that they would require x-rays as a basis. What is the legal/medical thoughts of everyone ???? Best Regards Mark Evans
Admin  
#2 Posted : 12 March 2004 19:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd The use of invasive medical imaging "just in case" is contra-indicated. Any effects from asbestos inhalation are unlikely for several decades. However, the long term effects of xrays are already known. An increased tendency to cancer. And it isn't a small increase either.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 12 March 2004 21:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Thomas. remember... Doctor knows best. So follow his advice, preferably given in writing if you can get it as evidence of course!! Don't forget though, all records in relation to medicals ect for asbestos MUST be kept for 40 years.... Regards... Stuart
Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 March 2004 23:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd As a matter of FACT: More people are killed every year by medical mistakes than by road traffic accidents. Statistically: 65 women a year contract breast cancer caused by invasive medical imaging. Doctor knows best ?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 13 March 2004 12:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Allan St.John Holt The advice you have been given here and by BUPA is quite right, though it's sometimes hard to convince people that 'magic science' can't instantly spot an issue that will take years to develop (if it does). The only medical evidence of asbestosis that can be readily detected by X-Ray is the presence of pleural plaques, and they are very hard to spot and need a trained X-Ray reader to identify. They take a long time to appear. No-one should submit to an X-Ray unless there is likely material benefit to be gained, which can be weighed against the real and known risks of X-Ray exposure. These people need to have their potential exposure recorded, and be encouraged to have regular medical checks on lung function, which is non-invasive. NB I am not a doctor, but this is a fairly common issue and the above is standard advice. Allan
Admin  
#6 Posted : 23 March 2004 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By thomas mark evans Gentlemen Thank you for the responses and the correct advice on not having X-rays it helped to clear up questions that had been posed. Thank you Mark
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.