Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 May 2004 19:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By allan wood we have just had an agency provide us with a non-english speaking labourer on one of our sites. without wanting to be racist in any way shape or form and purely from a health & safety point of view what are the legal implications if this chap has an accident (sorry forgot to mention he has a co worker whom interprets for him) i understand about the need for safety signage in his language but this would mean duplicating all site signage at a considerable cost for someone who may only be on site for the best part of a week. would it be feasable to use the terms not reasonably practicable to prevent this sort of problem from occuring in the first place, as previously stated no intention to be racist at all. any advise please.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 May 2004 09:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Haddon There has been a considerable increase in the use of agency staff at the warehouse where I work due to its impending closure. Many of the workers supplied have a very poor grasp of the English language. It is patently obvious that many of them do not understand the SSoW that we brief upon induction. Should the SSoW (and signage) be in their native language? Neither is "reasonably practicable" if you consider the costs involved vs. the impending closure, probable length of service, turnover of staff and the number of languages involved. The best suggestions I can offer you is to ensure adequate supervision (perhaps buddy up with his translator?) after completing a specific risk assessment to identify any hazards to him (perhaps consider him as a vulnerable worker due to the language barrier). When you sign this off, get the signatures from both him and the interpreter, and I think you will be as covered as you can be.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 May 2004 15:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By morganvw1 We also have a large turn over of grounds man. Agencies provide us with non speaking operatives. What they tend to do is have an interpreter for the first day, and then the rest of the week they would be on their own. Obviously we have got to know that the interpreter doesn't show after the first day, so we have approached the agencies and told them that any non speaking personnel will not be allowed on site without an interpreter. So far this has worked, and any operatives found on site that can’t understand the basics of English are told not to return the next day.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 31 May 2004 17:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By james mackie Allan we had a large amount of non english speaking labour on site. I have now introduced a non english speaking (NES) induction where the sub contractor has to supply an interpruter to translate the induction. They also had to supply a supervisor who could speak the parent language and english. If the supervisor doesn't turn up they don't work. This all came about because a HSE inspector visited a site and the NES employee couldn't tell him if his hard hat went on his head, hand or foot. The inspector then dug deeper and asked to see risk assessments and method statements from the sub contractor. The NES employee had signed off to say he understood the method statement. The HSE inspector asked the supervisor how he communicated the method statement in Russian. He didn't or couldn't. Can you see the potential pit you may fall into if you allow NES to work without someone to communicate (and supervise) in their own language? We have gone one stage further and introduced a 10 question simple test to confirm that all employees on site can understand and communicate health and safety information. You can't stop a competent employee who doesn't speak english working for you, but you must make sure that he is aware of the relevant health and safety information and others are not affected by this. This is NOT racism, it is duty of care to employees and others who may be effected by our undertakings.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.