Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 July 2004 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Bell A friend of mine has been suspended without pay as he is on medication for depression which his company's Occupational Health Depatment have said 'could make him dizzy'. He is a manual worker but I was under the assumption that an employer must find alternative duties for an employee if a medical condition temporarily prohibits usual work activities. Any advice on this issue would be appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 July 2004 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lance Morgan yes that is correct but they must do risk assessment to identify possible hazards and take steps to reduce any risk to health and safety. Next they should adjust hours if necessary and than if they are unable to do this attempt to find suitable alternative work. Last resort is to suspend from work on pay until such time as there is no risk to health and safety.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 July 2004 14:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eric Burt Keith This may be a DDA issue. The House of Lords has just ruled on a DDA case. The House of Lords has ruled that an employer has a duty to make reasonable adjustments for people who become unable to do their job due to disability including, where necessary, offering them an alternative post. The case concerned Mrs Archibald who was unable to pursue her job as a road sweeper for Fife Council after surgery left her unable to walk unaided. Under Fife Council’s redeployment policy, she applied unsuccessfully for over 100 posts in various council departments. In March 2001 the council dismissed her on the grounds of capability. The council subsequently employed her as supervisor at a local community centre. Mrs Archibald complained she had been discriminated against on grounds of disability and that her employers had failed to comply with a duty to make a reasonable adjustment under section 6 of the Disability Discrimination Act. The Disability Rights Commission, which supported her claim, argued that her appointment as a supervisor proved she was capable of this level of job and that she lost substantial earnings by not being transferred to a suitable job at the time she became disabled. Mrs Archibald’s claim was rejected by an employment tribunal, an Employment Appeal Tribunal and the Court of Session. The Court of Session ruled that a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people was not triggered by a worker becoming physically incapable of carrying out a job. It also said transfer to a different job was not a reasonable adjustment. The House of Lords has now overturned that decision and referred the case back to the employment tribunal. Hope this helps. Regards, Eric
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 July 2004 15:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Langston It will only be covered by the DDA if it is a long term mental or physical impairment that affects the persons day to day activities. Long term is defined as "if it has lasted, or will last, for at least 12 months, or is likely to have a lifetime effect".
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 July 2004 16:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Liz Johnston Suspension on medical grounds only applies where the following regulations apply: Control of Lead at Work Regs 1998 Ionising Radiation Regs 1999 COSHH Regs 2002 Employees may be suspended from work if continued exposure to these hazardous substances might damage the employee's health. Other than that any absence would be sickness and the employee paid accordingly (subject to DDA as above)
Admin  
#6 Posted : 06 July 2004 18:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I do hope your occupational health advisor is either medically qualified or has taken (written) professional advice. Suspension, especially without pay because medication "may make him dizzy" is a serious matter and should be fully justifiable. In court if necessary.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 July 2004 21:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karen Todd Hi Keith, Did they actually ask him if he was feeling dizzy, or just act on the warning that it may make him dizzy? Different people react differently to medication, some will suffer some of the side effects, others will not. For example, Tramadol is a pretty heavy duty painkiller. I first came across it when my husband had to take it for back pain after a lorry crash. He was like a living zombie and although he was off work anyway with the pain, he was in no fit state to drive. I then came across another lady who has been taking Tramadol for back pain long term. I asked her if she felt tired or dizzy but she appears not to have any side effects at all, and was myself suprised at her reaction to the drug compared to my husband's. Same medication, warning on packet about not driving or operating machinery if you feel drowsy, 2 very different reactions from 2 people on the same medication. Regards, Karen
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.