Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 September 2004 11:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Archer. Does anyone have a definitive list of what is classed as impairment under the DDA? and what is regarded as a progressive condition. For instance if a person is suffering from uncontrolled essential hypertension and has the odd day off work (about one a month) due to the effects of the medication given. Would this be included within the scope of the DDA and if so under which category
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 September 2004 13:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt The DDA is at http://www.legislation.h...a_19950050_en_1.htm#tcon In short it applies if a person has a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial, adverse and long-term effect (greater than 12 months) on their ability to carry out normal activities. Impairment can include mobility, manual dexterity, physical coordination, continence, ability to lift and move everyday objects, speech, hearing, eyesight, memory, concentration, learning, understanding and perception of risk. Jane
Admin  
#3 Posted : 09 September 2004 12:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason Gould Just to add, The DDA also includes anyone who has recovered from a disability in the last 12 months. Jason
Admin  
#4 Posted : 09 September 2004 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Lee Keith, did you eventually pass your Part2. I was on your course!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 13 October 2004 21:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simone Plaut if this is due to the effects of their medication, Sensible employers would use a homeopath, nutritionist and osteopath to reduce absence. their methods don't cause side effects as do usual allopathic (medical doctor prescribed)medicines. Does your firm offer Private medical insurance to staff as part of their perks? HSA include alternative medicine practitioners in the list of claims that can be covered.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 October 2004 08:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker I was under the impression that short term disabilities were covered too? Simone, sensible employers would steer well clear of quacks.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 October 2004 15:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor Booklet DL60 from the Disability Rights Commission seeks to explain the definition.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 October 2004 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Zoe Barnett I can honestly say that in my experience it is the complementary (not alternative!)therapy that has been the most beneficial and I would not wish to see other people deprived of potential benefits that these treatments can bring. I think we need to be very careful about labelling such practitioners as "quacks" - the best approach is to ensure that your homoeopath/osteopath/accupuncturist etc is properly qualified and a member of the appropriate Governing Body for that specialism.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 14 October 2004 22:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simone Plaut Quacks are noises made by ducks. Narrow minded individuals also perhaps? I use a naturopath and an osteopath and have been thoroughly impressed with the treatment provided. My General practitioner is only able to offer anti-inflammatory medication for my industrial Lumbar spine (back to you) injury, which irritate the stomach lining. My Health care background ( Radiography qualification and many years of NHS experience before becoming a safety practitioner) equips me to make judgements on this matter. What healthcare qualifications do you have in addition to your safety ones? What experience do you have of suffering an industrial injury and what treatments have you sampled other than what is on offer from your GP? Intrigued. Simone Plaut
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 October 2004 10:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Keith, Soory about the Hijack. I did not mean to insult osteopaths (having used one to cure a back injury) or nutritionists. Homeopaths are obviously (to this bigot anyway) con artists to anyone with even a little knowledge of chemistry and physics; however I concede the placebo effect has a part to play.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 15 October 2004 11:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Archer. Thanks to everyone who has responded I have a better understanding now, However I was of the understanding that if treatment is given to control/relieve the impairment then it still came under the scope of DDA as if the medical condition was still there. Peter, How are you keeping, I sat the exams twice and was referred both times although I did feel that I had done well the second time around, obviously NEBOSH speak is not my forte but then again neither is English unless it is in Yorkshire lingo. Doing the NVQ4 to which I feel more suited. Jim, No offence taken
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.