Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 September 2004 09:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By s.micklewright Hi all, I am writing a security policy for our organisation and need to add something on dealing with intruders into the building/office spaces. Does anybody have anything similar they would care to share, or point me in the right direction for info. Thank you Simon
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 September 2004 10:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Haynes You could try asking the Sergeant at Arms at Westminster [I bet he now knows what should be done]
Admin  
#3 Posted : 16 September 2004 11:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By s.micklewright I dont think the senior management team will accept the daily fancy dress code required in thier policy! Simon
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 September 2004 12:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad Simon Intruders into the building after hours would normally constitute breaking and entering, and a monitored burglar alarm system would alert the police to deal with it. (Although they get very disgruntled at continiously responding to false alarms) During the day when the office/building is occupied it is more difficult. If you have someone on site that is unwanted, i.e. an intruder, this comes under the realms of tresspass. Unless you have trained licensed security to remove them from the premises, you would still have to contact the police. I would talk to the local crime prevention officer to establish what the correct course of action would be.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 16 September 2004 12:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Evidently, if you are protecting empty houses belonging to little old ladies living in London, its OK to shoot them particually if they are unarmed and dressed in silly costumes.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 16 September 2004 13:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad Jim If the empty house happens to be Buckingham Palace and the little old lady happens to be the Queen, the possibility of getting shot must have been part of the risk assessment at some stage. If it wasn't, the perpetrators deserve to get shot for being so stupid not to at least think about it.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 16 September 2004 13:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Fats, I suppose we should both be apoligising for the highjack, but: Why should someone be shot at for trespass, its not a serious offence. Should HM the Q or MPs have greater level of protection than the rest of us? Why? I see the MPs are getting indignant about the possibility of being attacked in their place of work. Shame they have shown so little concern about others such as nurses and rail staff etc who have put up with this hazard for years now.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 16 September 2004 13:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad Jim You're right about the hijack.... apologies With regard to your comment about MP's concerns, I can see where you're coming from. Maybe this newfound concern of theirs over their own safety in the House can be used positively by the professional bodies and trade unions representing those in jobs that are at risk from violence, such as nurses, etc. As far as protection for MP's, Cabinet Ministers, the Queen etc is concerned, it is not a question of whether they DESERVE more protection than the rest of us, it is a question of who is more at risk. The prominent polliticians, Heads of State, etc have and will always be more at risk from attack by loonies, criminals etc than Joe Bloggs, Safety Adviser. Why did Batman not scale the roof of number 17 Average Suburban street, Croydon, to make his case. Coz doing it at Buck House would have a far greater impact, and coverage for his cause. Deserved higher protection or not, the fact is that the protection is there, and it is public knowledge that it is there. So, as far as I am concerned, if you feel the need to breach it, you must expect the possibility of being shot.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 16 September 2004 19:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard The fact is that nodody should be shot unless they present a clear threat to life. From the video footage I have seen, the guy at Buck House presented no such threat, since there was nobody home, or near. The guys in the House of Commons could easily have been suicide bombers, and could, and in my opinion should, have been shot. Just for the record I have done armed duties in various unsalubrious places over the last thirty years Richard
Admin  
#10 Posted : 17 September 2004 07:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt We have a site where we get a lot of intruders inside the buildings, but it is not always obvious that they are intruders due to the nature of the workplace (more than 1000 people, many of them students so often in outdoor clothing and carrying bags, etc). Therefore our first step is to find out whether they are. The good part about the site being so busy is that there are usually plenty of people about in the daytime. We have a policy that works something like this - if you are suspicious of someone, get a colleague to keep you in vision and at a safe distance while you approach them and ask 'how can I help you?' or something similar. The answer that they give will normally easily differentiate between a student, a legitimate visitor, a curious tourist or an intruder of ill-intent. If the latter, retreat, keep them in sight if possible, and ring the emergency number to get the emergency team (the five people who usually deal with fire and alarms), security and get the message relayed on to the Police. This works quite well; we have succeeded in getting people who were 'casing the joint' arrested using this method. Jane
Admin  
#11 Posted : 17 September 2004 13:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By s.micklewright Thank you all, Simon
Admin  
#12 Posted : 20 September 2004 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Todd I think Tony Martin got it absolutely right!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 20 September 2004 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Mathews No he didn't Rob. He left one of them alive to persue a claim for compensation! Richard
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 September 2004 08:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony O'Hara We had a big problem with a similiar thing. I worked at a large petrochemical complex in the north east of england and had this situation everyday. The way we could get round it was contact the police and have them charge them on a Vagrancy act. As you are well aware very little could be done with regards to trespassing so this was the only way the police could become involved. Regards Tony
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 September 2004 10:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor It's about time that trespass was made a criminal act rather than being treated as a civil matter requiring ligitimate occupiers to use only reasonable force to drive away the trespass or property owners having to go to lengthy methods to recover their own premises. As to a security policy, this will need to be site specific depending upon such variables as the risk presented by trespassers, the nature of the undertaking, the availability and willingness of police to attend unless a crime takes place, whether you have security staff and their job-descriptions.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 21 September 2004 14:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Maggie Atterbury Simon I suggest that you contact your local Police Crime Prevention and Architectural Liaison Officer - or what ever they call them your way. We have recently developed a security policy for our schools and he not only gave us his time and expertise, but also did a morning's training for us to launch the policy. Maggie Atterbury
Admin  
#17 Posted : 23 September 2004 08:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Delwynne If intruders are a serious problem perhaps you could consider installing a swipe card type system so only authorised personnel have access to the area? Just as a point of note, many organisations such as local crime prevention, British Transport Police etc. will tell you officially that you should approach intruders and ask their business etc. They will tell you unofficially not to be so silly and to leave the intruder to do what ever it is he is doing whilst you run in the other direction as quickly as possible!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.