Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 October 2004 15:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Weiland Hi all Hope some one can shed some light on this. At present I am working for a site with various factories and have been asked to update evacuation procedure. Staff levels around 450 people at any time. We are currently using a automated clocking system which HR wants to push as a register in event of a fire. The problem is can I justify telling Managers that they should obtain these lists via print whenever the alarm goes off. It could take 3 minutes roughly and I have already taken some concerns from Managers who say they will not put themselves at risk. My belief is that if they are not at risk they should be able to print off the details as it's an acurate reflection of what staff are on site at that time. But I know they will probably just assess that alarm as an automatic sign they should leave building which in theory was what I was always told. ahhhh can anyone help ? Cheers
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 October 2004 15:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rod Douglass Robert, You should be in an a place of comparative or ultimate safety within 180 seconds (3 minutes)The Managers have a valid point. You will have to look at alternatives, your Fire Wardens should ensure that their area of responsibility is clear, as far as reasonably practicable. (Do you have Fire Wardens?) Do you have a Fire Plan/Evacuation procedures? I would have a dry run with a Fire Drill, do not tell staff that you are having one this will defeat the purpose of the exercise.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 October 2004 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Debbie Walker Robert, We have the same problem with an automated system for attendance and access. One of the secondary problems to the time it takes for a print out to be generated are "the people who forgot their cards / their cards didn't work". These people will not be accounted for on any print out. Also, what happens if your fire is electrical and you have no means of printing? Debbie
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 October 2004 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Weiland We do have a Fire Plan but we now have this new fangled tech system where people clock in on a fob. Hr wants to use the Computer system as a way to get most acurate list of who's on site. One idea I was thinking was that Fire Warden's are to ensure that their area of responsibility is clear, as far as reasonably practicable. Then the Security prints off the lists which are then taken to the assembly points. Everyone would be out of the building and safe within 3 min (hopefully). It's just due to print time and transport time from Security to assembly points, check's may not be able to be done until 5m. Thanks for your quick response it's first time I've used these forums.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 October 2004 17:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi The more effective system is to have fire wardens "sweep"/check manageable areas for occupancy and relay the results to the chief fire warden at the assembly point. The "list" can be a back-up for knowing who was in the building should you experience an extreme event such as a collapse etc of a building and need to account for potential casualties. As already pointed out, lists are not fool proof whereas checks by fire warden is!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 October 2004 20:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie Oh no! Not the personnel checklist again! Scenario - I work in nine storey block, bags of corridors, four staircases, three lifts. I leave my office on the fifth floor and go to see someone three floors doown and four corridors away. Fire alarm goes, I leave with my colleague and go to the nearest assembly point. We carry on chatting, as is the way of these things, perhaps admiring the pretty patterns the flames make against the darkening sky etc. In the meantime, back at the assembly point I would normally use, some quarter of a mile away, someone calls the roll and finds I am missing. They tell the fire brigade, and several firefighters don BA to go into the building to search for me. How many times must it be said - fire marshalls/ wardens/ sweepers call them what you will, making a physical check are the safest option Laurie
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 October 2004 00:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Bywater Hi there, We have similar problems; but find the best method of handling this to be, that a register is taken at the start of every shift by Line Managers and extra staff are added manually, as and when necessary from other facories/depts. This is just about as good as it gets. I remember talking to a Fire Officer at an IOSH meeting in Yorkshire last year who said that after 20-odd years of fire drills there was ALWAYS something to be learned from every one. So don't be disheartened - watch and learn from every drill. I do not expect perfection from a quite imperfect world (I think that's a Carpenter's song) but it's quite realistic. Just keep learning, and teaching others along the way. Regards, Mark.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 October 2004 09:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman A lot of good sense in previous postings. I've had the same experiences - an electronic card reader at the front gate with printout in the guardhouse was never 100%. 12 years of exercises and always something new to learn. My advice is to rely on your sweeps. use your electronic system during "announced" evacuation exercises. It will help to show where your problems are. You can always check the printout after "surprise" exercices. We used ours on the "anomalies" basis : employees "badged in" in the morning and "badged out" when the bells rang. Those who had not completed both actions were left in the system and the final printout of their names took no more than 30 seconds. Installing an extra printer just inside the main entrance might also cut down the delays.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 October 2004 09:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tyler I agree with Merv completely. Rather than print a list of everyone, simply have a system where people 'log in' perhaps with a fob for example at the muster point. All those logged in will not be printed only those that have logged in in the morning at start of shift and haven't looged in at the muster point will be, this means that the list will be shorter and quicker to print. Of course this does not replace Fire Wardens sweeping their rspective areas which would be the ideal situation (once they have had sufficient training). Tyler
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 October 2004 11:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Elvis Article published on the Continuity Central website that may be of interest: RE: Accounting for staff following an evacuation http://www.continuitycentral.com/feature0127.htm
Admin  
#11 Posted : 25 October 2004 08:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Weiland Thanks for all the above guys found it really useful. The article above is great. I've just gotta argue with HR this week with regards to the system they wanna bring in. It's first time I've used these forums and I'm really greatful for the all the help received. Cheers
Admin  
#12 Posted : 25 October 2004 16:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Hayward If you have fire wardens appointed you could get them to "sweep" their area on the way out and report to a controller vthat the area is clear. That way you do't need names
Admin  
#13 Posted : 25 October 2004 17:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I think the consensus of this thread is "agree with your manager, then do the sensible thing" Get a good "sweep" or "fire warden" system in place. Be confident they will do their job conscientiously (they always have done in my experience) and report their findings to the Fire Brigade without interpretation (I mean : don't waffle, he is busy)
Admin  
#14 Posted : 25 October 2004 18:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Kingman A couple of friends of mine, who specialise in fire consultancy, have devised a system that can overcome problems with logging multiple floor buildings evacuation. It is a control board that works exactly the same way as a BA Entry control board for the Fire Brigade. The boards are manufactured by the same company that actually makes the control board for the brigades. The way they work is this: Each Fire Warden had a pack which contains a hi-viz jacket, and other useful items including a tally, which has details of where the Fire Warden is to check. When the warden has checked his/her area they evacuate to the RV point. The H&S manager or nominated person has the board at the RV point. The tallies slot into the board to show that the area has been searched and is clear. If there is any gaps then when the Brigade arrive they know exactly where they need to go, also because it looks like a BA ECB they can easily understand it. This is a simple but effective solution to a potentially difficult scenario. Please goto www.venturefire.co.uk they can also give advice on all aspects of fire safety etc as they have many years experience in the fire-fighting and fire prevention arena. I hope this assists. Kind regards Martin
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.