Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 31 October 2004 20:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By August Engineering HS(G)65 stresses the need to "manage in safety and not inspect out defects". Yet legislation such as the PSSR and LOLER require us to undertake regular examinations regardless of the use, duty and maintenance of, for example, pressure and lifting equipment. Should not the Competent Persons be seeking to audit the operations and maintenance records of such equipment rather than certifying its fitness for further use based on a "snapshot" inspection? I'd be grateful fot opinions on this matter. Thanks & Regards Chris.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 01 November 2004 01:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alistair Reid From a LOLER perspective the examination required by Reg 9 is not just a snapshot inspection but an engineering judgement of the Competent Person that, assuming the equipment is used for the intended duty and within the working conditions as declared by the organisation using the equipment, that it is fit for a continued period of use. The maximum period of that continued use is set by Reg 9 however - - Where conditions are arduous or use is extreme then the Reg 9 Competent Person may reduce the period - Where for sound reason the period of examination can be extended then a Written Scheme of Examination can be established to support that decision. The operating conditions of the item being examined are taken into account by the Reg 9 Competent Person as part of the thorough examination process and if it is felt necessary by the competent person to view maintenance, CE, test documentation then this will be requested. Likewise the other Competent Person as required under Reg 8 may also wish to view this documentation and the current Report of Thorough Examination when they are planning the lift to be carried out. As for ensuring that the equipment is maintained, operated correctly and within the restraints set by the two competent persons then that is an issue for the general management of the organisation using the equipment to Manage In Safety.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.