Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 01 November 2004 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Roger Button Can anyone come up with a definition of the word 'effective' as applied to isolations and especilly when used in the context - "ensuring the isolations are effective"
Admin  
#2 Posted : 01 November 2004 12:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad Roger As far as I am concerned isolations ahould be "effective in two ways, i.e. 1. Completely isolating the area/equipment to be worked on from any source of energy and 2. Isolating it in such a way that the energy can not (inadvertently or otherwise)be restored while there is a danger to people working on the equipment
Admin  
#3 Posted : 01 November 2004 12:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Roger Button fats Many thanks for your response. That is my interpretation of being 'effective'. By using your definition it is easy to demonstrate that the isolations are effective.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 November 2004 13:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman "ensuring effective isolation" is represented by the word "Try" in "Lock, Tag, Clear and Try" ie having effectively isolated all energy sources an attempt should be made to start the installation in the normal manner (pushing the start button for example)If the installation does not start then you have ensured the effectiveness of your isolation. You will of course have "cleared" the danger zone before your try, just in case your isolation is not effective
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 November 2004 13:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David A Jones There are many ways of describing effective isolation - but I would agree with that provided by Fats
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 November 2004 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By P. C. Take a look at this Isolation Policy/Procedure. https://www.cfbean.com:42701/Policies/Policies/Safety%20and%20Env%20Policies/Bean%20Isolation%20Policy.doc Note: MS Word document. If link broken due to wrap, paste full URL to browser. Regards, ...PC www.hazmat101.com
Admin  
#7 Posted : 03 November 2004 09:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Batty Hi, a point to rememeber if the isolation is for something like a motor driving an impellor within a vessel, and the vessel is to be entered (Possible confined space). Please note that unless the shaft is mechanically prevented from movement, the impellor may be pushed within the vessel and the inertia from the free movement of the impellor can cause trapping injuries. Isolation should include mechanical locks capable of preventing movement, on rotating or similar plant. Peter
Admin  
#8 Posted : 03 November 2004 14:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By neil poyznts-powell Roger, Your procedure would also ned to take account of the possibility that their may be residual energy e.g. energy stored within a capcitor and this would need to be made safe! If it will help I can send you a copy of the Lockout, Tag & try procedure I use and associated TI. Regards, Neil
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.