IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Occupational voice loss is now an official workplace disease
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sharon
The UK government has recognised occupational voice loss as an injury qualifying for industrial injuries benefit in teachers and other workers who have to speak up to earn a living.
Anyone come across this?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Eric Burt
Sharon
Thanks for this. Do you have any more info / links?
I am involved in a civil case whereby a teacher is claiming voice problems due to chalk dust (on-going), but I have never heard of voice problems causes by merely having to talk louder. Is there medical evidence to show that talking louder can causes voice problems and is there a definition of "louder"?
This opens a whole can of worms for other professions - football managers, town criers, auctioneers, etc etc.
Any further info would be appreciated.
Regards,
Eric
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MarkSMark
Hopefully the Guidance will recommend we muzzle the employees
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Eric
Paul Cardinus at Newcastle University is a leading UK researcher in the area of occupational voice injury.
The journal of the British Voice Association has published research about the occupations in which people are most exposed to voice hazards.
Details should be available through Google.
Otherwise, if you want an article I wrote on this subject in Occupational Health in March 2003, email me on kieran@enablingpeople.co.uk
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Eric Burt
Sharon / Keirnan
Many thanks for this useful advice.
Eric
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Delwynne
It may also be interesting to those who are reading this posting that voice loss can also be caused by stress reactions. A google search on voice loss should pull up something on this if anyone is interested.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Sharon
It's actually somewhat misleading to assert that voice loss (or other forms of voice dysphoria) is/are 'officially' a disease.
Your source was a union website, not a medical source.
For an indicator on the difficulties in reliably in specifying voice hazards and identifying valid methods of control, why not ask 5 colleagues how they define 'voice' and compare and contrast the differences?
There is ongoing research about the sources of voice problems. As Delwynne observes, the consensual professional view amongst speech and language researchers is that 'stress' (what a ragbag term!) is a factor; more precisely, 'cognitive' and 'emotional' factors are 'psychogenic' sources where, as in the great majority of cases, there is no evidence of an organic cause. 'SaLT'(Speech and Language Therapy) research therefore increasingly advocates cognitive-behavioural therapy as a treatment which 'works' by assisting the patients to understand how their beliefs, values, feelling and thought patterns influence their behaviour in ways that result in voice production problems.
When I did some research into the subject in Spring 2003, I spoke with a doctor-manager within the HSE; he reasonably observed that there was inadequate epidemiological evidence on the matter and it hasn't greatly changed in the last 18 months.
That said, 'professional' voice users i.e. those for whom speaking or singing requires use of the use for a significant proportion of their time are relatively more exposed to hazards to their vocal organs than others.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By James M
Now I know what my sargen't major meant when he told us this is hurting me as much as it's hurting you as he blasted us with verbal from point blank range!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
James
Your observation gives a clue to your relative lack of youth! SM's are no longer permitted to use their voices as they did!
Around 2000, the newspapers proclaimed with glee that the Surgeon General's Office had forbidden the traditional barking on parade.
Apparently, a new occupational health doctor to the SG's office had advised accordingly, on the basis of several claims for occupational injury filed when he had previously been Head of Occupational Health in the L. B. of Croydon.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Katie Hoyland
would an incident of someone merely going hoarse be classed as a near miss?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
I believe the answer to Katie's interesting question depends on to what extent the hoarseness can be related to demands and conditions of the individual's work; hoarseness can be a symptom of stress, for example.
In the standard OSH manner, assess the work-related risks. Unless they're negligble, take control actions:
a. rest the voice
b. if a week's rest doesn't clear the hoarseness, as a Speech and Language Therapist is likely to require a medical referral (just in case there's a serious underlying organic problem such as a cancer), ensure the person has a checkup by a doctor in the first instance
c. educate other staff in occupational voice hygiene and management.
Like in many psychogenic areas of occupational health, voice dysphoria can sometimes become very problematic if the suffering employee is simply left to their own devices.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Katie Hoyland
I'll take that as a maybe then kieran
x
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By fats van den raad
We are a society gone soft. RSM's not allowed to bark on parade grounds for fear of catching occupational hoarseness!!!
Obviously never met my RSM. The man brushed his teeth with barbed wire and gargeled with peroxide. In all the years of him barking all day every day, I cannot remeber him being hoarse once. And the same goes for myself and other instructors too.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Maggie Atterbury
Any one who has to speak at work for long periods to large groups can experience voice strain and serious voice / thraot problems. I know of at least 5 teachers who have had to seek medical help for this and the DfES says that teachers are more likely to suffer than any other occupational group in their publication "Fitness to Teach". Apparently preventative measures include having good ventilation and a reasonable humidity in the workplace and for the speaker to relax the throat and face muscles and take frequent sips of water.
Hope this helps
Maggie Atterbury
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By fats van den raad
Done training 8 hours a day 5 days a week, never had any problem with my voice. I just make sure the ole' voicebox get well lubricated every night!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
'Maybe' as a valid risk assessment of voice injury depends on the occupational context.
As in most areas of psychogenic disorders, occupational voice hazards are probably best classified in categories of 'probably', 'maybe', 'possibly', 'unlikely.'
Available research data indicate that singers are the occupational group most at risk of voice injury; the level of scientifically-established hazard is several hundred times that of other 'professional voice user' groups who include actors, sales professionals, teachers and clergy.
The reported DfES recommendations on controlling voice hazards seriously fail to have adequate regard for scientific evidence on necessary safeguards against stress-related voice disorders, even those recommended in their own guidance on stress management in schools, endorsed by 22 stakeholder organisations.
Whether the world may be judged as gone 'soft' or otherwise, safeguarding even RSMs from injury is arguably in the interest of the employer and those who actually foot the bill for RSM behaviour.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rory O'Neill
I saw a sniffy mention about the source of this story being "a union publication". Here's your chance to read for yourselves, on our fully updated webpage:
www.hazards.org/voiceloss
Incidentally, hundreds of union reps become members of IOSH every year. I've been one for donkey's years. Lots of us also have pretty impressive safety credentials (en route to this website I've been a fellow at safety departments at UCLA, De Montfort and Stirling).
That said, I've met union reps with trade union training who were more effective than I'll ever be - and they deserve all our respect.
If you want to see some of the supporting evidence to back these ravings, try:
www.hazards.org/unioneffect
www.safetyreps.org
Best wishes, Rory
Rory O'Neill
Hazards Magazine www.hazards.org
TUC Risks www.tuc.org.uk/risks
TUC Changing Times www.tuc.org.uk/changingtimes
Health, safety and environment officer
International Federation of Journalists
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Sadly, Rory O'Neill's choice of language such as 'sniffy' and 'ravings' greatly undermines the credibility of his claims.
To say that a union is not 'official' is not necessarily 'sniffy' unless the union officers choose to label anyone who distinguishes between their authority and that of a statutory organisation in those terms.
Thankfully, safety management is not open to the sad misrepresentation Rory has found necessary in this instance.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rory O'Neill
A slight over-reaction, I think. I certainly did not intend to provoke such ire.
The message was just a gentle attempt to remind the list that union sources can be just as informed and credible as any other. I'm sure some of you think this is true; I'm sure other don't. I can live with that.
I have read quite a bit of correspondence on this chat site and much of it is of a casual, unguarded nature (some off topic, which I can live with) so I don't think my posting is particularly objectionable or remarkable in style.
Yours, Rory
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rod Douglass
RSM's not allowed to shout on the drill square, I have never heard such drivel.
I know that the PC brigade are trying to get everyone to "hug a tree" but this is ridiculous. I left the Army in 2001 and was still barking orders on the Drill Square, no one informed not to. Go to changing of the Guard at Buckingham Palace and see if the Sergeant Major doesn't shout!!!
I remember when I was a Military Instructor at The REME Apprentice College they were trying to bring in the Red and Yellow Card system.
If you were taking a lesson and a Recruit placed his or her hand into their pocket and produced a Yellow card, it was to tell the Instructor that you are putting to much pressure on the Recruit back off.
If this pressure continued the Recruit could go to their pocket again and produce a Red Card, they then could get up and dissmiss themselves from the lesson. (Unbelievable)
When my Company Commander a Major asked my view, I explained that that is all very well and good but we are training these Recruits to fight Wars and you cannot Molly Codule these Soldiers because nothing and I mean nothing can prepare you for the Horror of War. I then stated "So are we going to use this method when we go into Battle, as 20,000 Enemy Soldiers come over the brow of the hill flash the yellow card and if that does not work then we will have no alternative to give them the red card"!!!!!!!! I was called a Dinosaur by the Major, but Hey Ho the system was not used.......
Aye,
Rod D
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Rory
I regret that I conveyed an impression of 'ire'; more of irritation, perhaps.
Actually, I believe I we share many objectives. My concern in this instance is that Sharon and your good self may be undermining your case by overstating it.
Take care
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rory O'Neill
Not wishing to over egg this one, but the Hazards article doesn't say a thing about barring anyone from talking, be they drill sergeants or safety officers.
It talks about common sense safety measures, within the framework of existing legislation, to ensure workers can continue to use their voices.
It might not be the greatest risk in the workplace, but it is a genuine risk and simple, sensible measures can make the workplace safer. Not too much to ask.
The article, warts and all, is freely available on the website at: www.hazards.org
Best wishes, Rory
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stuart Nagle
Is there a standard test - e.g. decibels omitted at set distances - to indicate when one should stop shouting and implement control measures ;)
Stuart
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Anne Lawson
Dear Eric
I have no experience of this in this country but know that in the USA it is a recognized work related illness - workers that use their voices to shout at work (eg stockbrokers) are heavily insured against it. The individual I have knowledge of developed nodules on the vocal cords which caused an irreversible reduction in speech volume and made coherence of his speech difficult - he has been unable to return to his job as a futures broker for 4 years and it is unlikely he will work again.
Hope this information helps
Anne Lawson
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Occupational voice loss is now an official workplace disease
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.