Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian Stone
As a College we have lots of offsite trips/activities run each year (about 600+), with things from visiting a local shop to walking holidays and everything in between, with age range of 14-85.
We get the staff to fill out notification forms and risk assess the activity. This is then checked and double checked by relevant people (eg mountain rescue groups or pot holing association!)
The problem we have is that staff are worried about their liability on these trips, following info from their unions, and also some of the assessments we get in are poor despite training they have undertaken.
We have been investigating the use of a CD ROM package that the local council provides to all of its schools that has a database of about 1500 different activities with generic hazards and controls that would be expected for that activity. It allows you to search an activity and accept the hazards and controls on the CD and modify/add to them so its individual to that activity, it then saves this new assessment.
Has anyone else come across anything similar that we could look at?
Many thanks
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Ian,
At Careers Wales my colleague has produced a good practice guide on organised visits & trips with clients.
I will forward you a copy by e-mail and trust it will be helpful to you.
Unlike the CD Rom you describe it does not list specific hazards, although it might provide a few general pointers for your staff.
(I would never use a computer generated list of hazards as a substitute for consultation with the trip organisers anyway - but then we do not do 600 trips a year!)
Also, check the recent Field Trips For Adolescents thread.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian Stone
Thanks for the response
The event organiser works through the CD assessments, for example:
they are rock climbing, they would click on the relevant subject and a list of hazards would appear that would normally be associated with that activity they then click to accept these hazards, then controls that would be expected for that hazard comes up, if they decide that the control is no good or wrong they can change it but will be aksed several times if they are sure they want to change it. The process then follows through and comes up with a risk assessment for that activity.
The system seems to be good.
Ian
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.