Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 09 December 2004 15:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ray Fox
I am interested in members experiences and controls regarding the provision of prescription spectacles under the PPE Regs(not DSE Regs). The prescription may be for reading only and not essential to the actual task (other than reading instructions)
During safety audits employees often don't have the prescription spectacles at hand!
What are members thoughts on this issue?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 09 December 2004 17:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Where your risk assessment indicates that eyr protection is necessary and the concerned workers need prescription glasses, then I would strongly recommend that the employer supply prescription safety glasses. Asking an employee to wear "coverall" safety glasses over his own glasses can be done but it is not comfortable for the employee and they have a tendancy not to wear the "coveralls".

Admin  
#3 Posted : 09 December 2004 19:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Delwynne
Yet again I couldn't agree with Merv more!
Although employees may only require glasses for 'reading' it would be difficult to justify not providing safety specs in a situation where they are not expected to be doing a great deal of reading. They may need to read instructions, signs, warning labels etc at any time. You can get some reasonable quality bi & vari-focal safety glasses now so I would go with providing safety specs for anyone who wears specs and needs access to 'eye protection' areas
Admin  
#4 Posted : 10 December 2004 11:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad
Ditto, Ditto. From experience, company implemented Mandatory eyeprotection policy. One employee (process operator)presented prescription that stated he requires reading glasses. Co. refused to supply prescription safety specs. Employee wears co. issued safety specs, then removes them to put on his own specs whenever he needs to read something, then replaces safety specs.

C'mon... surely you can see it coming already??? Yep, you guessed it during this "changeover" ritual while fitters were working in the area, employee got foreign body in eye, later determined as a sliver of metal from fitters using impact wrench. Nearly lost use of the eye.

PS. Co. issued him with prescription safety specs after accident.. Nice of them, hey??!!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 December 2004 21:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason Touraine
Does it not depend on what sort of eye protection is required. Prescription spectacles are not available for the full range.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 12 December 2004 07:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Since the original question concerned quite specifically safety glasses, we were keeping it simple. Chemical goggles, full and half masks or BA sets will of course complicate the problem. You may eventually ask yourself if the employee is medically fit to do the job. Or even try to engineer out the risk. Wouldn't that be a good idea ?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.