Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 10 December 2004 13:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Al Beevers
Our lifts and fork truck are inspected by the insurers.

We also have several pallet trucks, which as far as I can work out would have to have a similar thorough inspection. It seems to be a bit much to get the insurers in to look at pallet trucks, though I don't see the pre-use checks can be counted as thorough.

Any pointers as to who should do this?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 10 December 2004 13:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gordon Thelwell
Hi Al,

Your insurers should inspect them at the same time as your FLT's. As for your inhouse inspections, the manufacturer or supplier of your pallet trucks has an obligation to supply you with comprehensible information regarding health, safety, maintenance and inspection.

Here is some guidance regarding LOLER - lift trucks/pallet trucks and inspections.

http://www.therackgroup....show&action=topics&fid=3
Admin  
#3 Posted : 10 December 2004 14:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Hammerton
Assuming the pallet trucks you refer to are the manual, hand operated type, they would not fall under the scope of LOLER (the principal function is not for lifting or lowering of the type associated with ‘traditional’ lifting equipment) and do not have to have a statutory thorough examination although as work equipment they still need inspecting and maintaining, details of which should be supplied by the manufacturer.

Adam
Admin  
#4 Posted : 10 December 2004 14:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simon Ayee
HSE contract research report 429/2002 "Thorough examination and inspection of particular items of lifting equipment" is quite useful.

Quote from the introduction:
"The new regulations are "goal setting" and their potential scope is extremely wide. However, they are risk based Regulations so the extent of the risk will determine the measures needed to eliminate or control it. This means that just because equipment can be defined as lifting equipment it does not necessarily mean that it has to be thoroughly examined. For example, the risks associated with a pedestrian controlled pallet truck are relatively low and servicing/maintenance requirements are likely to be adequate to ensure the safety of such equipment."

Admin  
#5 Posted : 10 December 2004 18:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By P Williams
standard pallet trucks ie ones that only raise the load of the ground to facilitate movement of the load are deffo not covered by LOLER. PUWER would be the most appropriate regs, therefore in house maintenance so long as competent will suffice.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.