Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 December 2004 21:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper I have undertaken a risk assessment of a wood press. The press consists of four hydraulic rams and plattens that press and hold wood sheet material after applying adhesive and laminate. The front and rear of the machine is open with no guards. Operation of the rams is by 4 levers that applies pressures of up to 250bar.on each ram. I have advised the company to fit inlerlocking guards to front and rear, but the company say that all these types of presses do not have guards fitted. Although the risk of an accident is unlikely I have still advised the fitting of guards. has anyone had experience of these types of machines. If this was in the engineering industry, guards would be fitted, so I do not see the difference. Barry
Admin  
#2 Posted : 13 December 2004 21:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I shall start my response with a few technical comments : &é"' mate you cant let the €'èù*$-éµ& get away with that ! It doesn't matter what industry you are in. Powered equipment must conform to the legislation. I am sure that my erstwhile colleagues will supply you with all references to relevant legislations, such as PUWER. Which I am sure you know already and are just looking for professional opinions to back you up. OK ?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 13 December 2004 22:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By RP you should contact the manufacturers of the equipment who can offer the best advice. They also have to comply with the Regs
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 December 2004 09:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Mackessack Hi Barry, The presses you are describing sound very similar to two that I am familiar with - both of which are fitted with light curtains, interlocked and covering the full length of the press opening front and rear. Both machines are less than 5 years old. I may be able to get some photos - let me know if I can help. John
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 December 2004 10:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Roger the Dodger From the information given, I would have said the machine needs light curtain as described in the last posting. It should be remembered under PUWER (Regulation 11) you have to follow the 4 step heirarchy of machine guarding - just trusting to employees training/skills is the last level of control. It should also be remembered that there is a higher standards applied to machine guarding i.e. 'so far as practicable' NOT 'so far as reasonably practicable'. 'Practicable' has been defined by h&s case law as 'to the extent of technical knowledge' - I forget the exact wording, but basically it means if safeguarding a machine danger zone is technically possible, then you would probably loose a claim/prosecution in the event of an accident at the machine, if it could be shown that guarding was technically possible.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 December 2004 15:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeff I'd use the term light sensors instead of curtain but yes they must have them. As an a apprentice in a large shopfitting company I remember a German ex-prisoner of war whose job was to make plywood with the aid of two presses. He used to have my utmost admiration in the way he managed this job and everyday living with just two fingers on one hand and three on the other - not from the war as you might guess, but by leaving his hands in the presses. Hopefully conditions have improved since then. Jeff PS: You weren't a proper machinist in those days unless you had something missing!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 December 2004 16:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gerry Knowles I am currently doing some work for a company which manufactures composite doors as part of the process they apply UPVC skins to a wood frame they then use adhesive as the bonding agent. The doors are then placed in stacks of 10 and pressed using a presses similar to the ones that you describe. I to had told the company that guarding is required and have advised light curtains at the front of the press. The rear is not accessable so it is not a problem. Again I am using PUWER to get my case home. Keep on at the company management it sometimes takes a while to get through but you will get there.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 December 2004 20:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Bedford All good advice - by the way - is that the Barry Cooper who used to work at Wakefield Met Council - now at Leeds CC?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 14 December 2004 21:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper Thank you all for your advice. Nice to know that we all have the same view on guarding the press. I will continue to push the management of the company to fit guards. One interesting thing is I would not have considered light guards. I was more for sliding up/down interlocked guards. But the choice is theirs, but I will stress the advantages of light guards, less maintenance, no hassle closing etc. Thank you all and all the very best for Christmas and New Year Barry
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.