Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 December 2004 10:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Liam Nolan Hi A problem has been brought to my attention today (as company Safety Advisor), that one of our employees has very little personal hygiene, in other words, to be blunt, he smells. He works off site sometimes and shares a van with another operator, though, when he does work at the main office (on the shop floor - he is an apprentice) the other employees are 'offended' by the body odour emminating from him. I remember seeing something about this somewhere, but can't remember where it was. The Personnel Manager has already discussed the issue with the individual, but there was no improvement to the situation. The Company doctor has been consulted and has said that the issue is not a medical one - the individual just does not wash. Outside of the BO issue, I can see other issues such as hygiene issues in the canteen (and how it affects the other employees), Toilet facilities, etc. To compound the problem, our work is in the sewage treatment sector, where hygiene issues for our employees are at the forefront. If the individual is not washing (and the same goes for his clothes) he is also contaminated with sewage. There have been complaints from his co-workers on this issue. Any comments or pointer in the right direction (especially related to Ireland) would be gratefully appriciated. Of course I understand that this situation will have to be handled carefully and with due consideration to the individual concerned. Regards, Liam
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 December 2004 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad Liam As far as the hygiene issues in working in the sewage treatment industry goes, this can be managed by procedure. I worked in the water utilities industry (including sewage treatment) both here and in South Africa and we had similar procedures in place to deal with hygiene. First of all, training on personal hygiene, washing hands, when where, how etc. Second, procedures to ensure work clothes, including shoes stays at work and does not go home, clean/dirty changing facilities, arrangements for washing workwear,etc. All these systems help to keep people free from bugs etc. that can easily be picked up and spreaded by bad hygiene. Who knows, if you start this hygiene initiative and training, it may snap the stinky fellow out of his dirty habbits. If that fails, theres always the way that these things were dealt with in the army, involving cold showers, yard and other hard bristled brushes and Jayes fluid. Maybe less subtle but guaranteed results!!
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 December 2004 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly I know this is a serious issue which needs to be dealt with carefully but couldn't resist posting an account of how my manager, Mr Subtle as a Seldgehammer, dealt with a similar problem. New member of staff starts, young, innocent, first job etc - very bad BO. We put up with it for 4 weeks but then summer starts and the air conditioning fails. One particularly bad day said manager looses the plot turns round to new member of staff and screams - "that's it I can't take it any more - do you realise you (finger pointed very accusingly) f***ing stink! Do you know what a bl**din shower and deodorant is, sort it out or I'll do wot we did in the army for blokes like you!!!!" Proceed to graphic account of army procedures for dealing with BO and rest of team pretending to be deep in their work but secretly relieved that something had been said, albeit somewhat crudely. Having said that the offender smelt of roses for the rest of the time he was in our team -although he is now on site full time where the problem seems to have returned and the site guys are now threating to carry out the army procedure. ahhhhh the construction industry... Regards Jennifer
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 December 2004 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly Fats - bosses' army procedure very similar to the one you outlined although the added twist the site team have threatened to put on it is to use the washpit as a makeshift bath. We shall see what happens!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 December 2004 13:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad Jennifer Any source of cold water will do!! I've seen this done once in the army (One of the guys in adjacent barracks) and you wont believe how harsh a bogbrush can be on the skin. Add the Jayes fluid to the raw skin and you can imagine how it stings.!! Saying that, dirty little bleeder showered three times a day from that day on and turned out to be a model of hygiene and cleanliness..... Come to think of it, I seem to remeber he became quite obsessive about hygiene... seeing germs everywhere.......
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 December 2004 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Adams In the Navy, there is the added disadvantage of living in very compact quarters, but the added advantage of a plentiful supply of fire hoses to teach the error of their ways. Meesmates generally learn quickly! On a serious note, in our modern PC world where such action will be seen as bullying, I would have thought the average contract of employment would have a requirement to maintain personal standards, i.e. hygiene, dress etc. Therefore, if all else fails, there is always the disciplinary route to clean employees!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 December 2004 18:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Linda Crossland-Clarke Hi Tell him there is an email for him on the office PC and paste this link in!! Linda
Admin  
#8 Posted : 15 December 2004 08:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Weiland All wrap a bar of soap or body spray and leave in a hamper like style for Xmas. I have seen this done the guy who got them quite shortly after but at least the smell went.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 15 December 2004 19:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Liam. Fats is right concerning looking after hygiene in the sewage industry, and in respect of military barrack room action. As someone who has had experience of both, I know the nettle is sometimes hard to grasp, but this chap has be told - in no uncertain terms what is expected of him. I take it that your site has all the usual facilities, outlined by Fats above... so get the guy to use them. I fully understand the other guys getting peed with someone who contaminates their clean environment - it is not nice and can spear all sorts of nasties about. Work clothing: Are there no arrangements for this to be laundered by the company? Why is this chap continually wearing soiled clothing to work in? Whilst I hate to say it... If the other guys on site do decide to give him a hot tub, scrub and a rub, they and your company could find themselves in hot water (as opposed to cold) nowadays, so despite personnel talking to him, perhaps he needs a little more 'incentive' by way of a not so friendly talking to. Although it was mentioned above as having been done ... and was not exacly PC, the short sharp shock is sometimes exactly what is required. Lastly, of course, there are those of us who do suffer from sweaty body odor, that is seems no amount of spray-can smellies can swage... and doing dirty strenuous work does not help... The only remidy is plenty of hot showers, shampoo, soap and smellies and plenty of clean working gear to get changed into. Seems to me you're going to have to bite the bullet here!!! Stuart
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 December 2004 23:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PaulA We still do favour the direct approach within the Navy and consider it a duty as a Senior Rating to consider the welfare of our other 'subordinates' (Military term.. I hate it as well!!) One of our female Wrens was advised to spend more on perfume though as the "pound a gallon from a car boot sale" variety she chose to wear was making her fellow workers sick!! I cringed, but you have to laugh!!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 16 December 2004 09:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Liam Nolan Hi, Some clarification. The individual does not work on a sewage treatment plant full time, occasionally he visits one or a pumping station to remove equipment for repair. There are numerous considerations to consider as this is not the dark ages, namely, we (the company) do not want what some of you refer to has 'barrack room action' to take place for the following reason - 1. it could spark a alligation of Bullying, which would make an unfortunate situation worse and place the companies position on trying to solve the problem sensitively as a secondary issue (as ultimatly the individual could end up dismissed if he does not improve his own situation). 2. As you are all aware allowing horseplay is totaly against most companies policy from a H&S point of view. Therefore the company cannot turn around and quitly tell the lads 'take him out the back and give him a srub.' The individual has still got rights. 3. The individual's work mates have take the right course of action in reporting to Personnel on the issue. They expect the company to deal with it, and rightly so. The work mates are not going to expose themselves to charges (more than likely criminal charges) of assualt, which is what would happen if they took matters in their own hands. As I mentioned in my initial post, the company has recieved the complaints on the subject, the Personnel Manager has already discussed the problem with the individual, but this resulted in no improvement. We are now looking for the next step to take, i.e. do we talk to the individual again? Is it best practice to give him another chance but spell out the likely outcome of no improvement (eventual dismissal)? do we issue a verbal warning right now? etc. Is there a code of practice on the subject? (what I was looking for initially from my first post). Quite frankly, advising me to have the lads take him out and do it for him because thats what we did in the army, shocks me from a Safety Advisors point of view. I assume that most, if not all, of you replying are practicing Safety Advisors? If you had this situation in the work place (not the millitary) would you take the same action? Some of you have suggested that the direct approach from co-workers or a hugh hint (like a bar of soap) should be tried. Well I'm only after being informed of the situation so I don't know if this had been tried by his fellow workers. Anyway, now that the Management has been officially informed a constructive and dignified approach has to be taken to solve the problem. There are other issue that must also be considered, if the situation is not dealt with correctly and above board and the individual is eventually dismissed, then charges of unfair dismissal or constructive dismissal may be considered by him. We have unfair dismissal laws here (in Ireland) as I'm sure you have in your relevent countries. So please anyone got a Code of Practice on dealing with this situation? Liam
Admin  
#12 Posted : 16 December 2004 10:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By fats van den raad Liam I merely mentioned the "barrack room" approach to this particular problem as an extreme example of how the problem would be dealt with in the military. This was done in the cause of bringing a bit of humour to the table, tongue in cheek. At no time do I recall that I or any other person actually advised you that this is the course of action you should take. If you could not see the humour in this and it went over your head, then that is your problem. If you are looking for a Code of Practise on dealing with BO, I can tell you now, it doesn't exist. Life is not like that. There are no instruction manuals for every situation that you are going to come across. You or your management will have to deal with the individual on an individual basis, head on. I do not think that you will be able to make any disciplinary action stick either, never mind sacking the employee. What's next? Sacking a female employee because someone complained about her perfume? Or what about the young employee with the spotty skin? surely that puts someone off their lunch?
Admin  
#13 Posted : 16 December 2004 10:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Liam, I actually don't really understand why this has been 'gifted' to you as an H&S issue. Since there is no risk to either health or safety, I would see this as work conduct issue, and would expect it to be a fair and square personnel thing. It's more like turning up to work inappropriately dressed, surely, rather than running around waving a hammer or wedging a guard open? In other words, yes, I agree entirely that a dignified approach is needed, and horseplay or bullying isn't the solution, but I would pass this buck as quickly as possible, John
Admin  
#14 Posted : 16 December 2004 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Allen Liam, I've read all the posts in this thread including your original and your most recent posting. I have to say that I agree with your view in the last one. Taking the guy out in the yard and scrubbing him down with a stiff brush, hose and carbolic soap may be very funny (and as we have been told all tongue in cheek) but it doesn't help your problem at all. I had a similar problem a few years ago. The person in question had such bad BO that no one would share an office with him and some people wouldn't even go into a meeting room that he had been in unless the window was left open for an hour afterwards. I was therefore surprised that your company doctor said it was nothing to do with him. Our Doc was only too glad to help, counselled the person and ensured that he adopted a personal hygiene regime that brought about a considerable reduction in odour. As safety advisers we have a broad remit. Thirty years ago safety was thought only to be about engineering; fencing machinery or securing scaffolding for instance. Like it or not nowadays it is about human factors. We can't just say its HR's responsibility if it's tricky. Safety is a dsicipline with a well defined core but as many posts on this website prove, no outer boundary.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 16 December 2004 11:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Granted, safety is much more about human factors and behaviours than it used to be, but essentially it remains a discipline concerned with risk awareness and control and injury and ill-health reduction. So although the boundaries between (pure) HR & (pure) H&S are flexible, this flexibility is surely more about us guiding HR in creating the conditions which make safe, efficient work rewarding and practicable, while HR guides us in ensuring that what we do helps create a positive culture in the workplace. Of course in some cases we are both HR & H&S, but the two disciplines are still not the same. Whether somebody smells or not is still an HR issue in my book, and it's really not one that I feel would be within my knowledge or experience to manage. Pass it on, John
Admin  
#16 Posted : 16 December 2004 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Liam Nolan Hi, Thanks, the last few post have been more like the kind of advice and pointer I was initially expecting. My initial reaction was also that it is a HR problem, but to explore all the possibilities, I said I would look into it from a S&H point of view. Small point, the company doctor didn't say it wasn't anything to do with him, he just said it wasn't a medical condition. He also advise the Personnel Manager to talk to our Safety Officer (me). Yes it is a sticky one and from my reasearch it does seem to be mainly a HR problem. As for some replys made today. I am Irish and we have what is generally accepted, world wide, as the most finely honed sense of humour in the world. My problem with the first replys and the 'humour' injected into the thread is that I could see my serious inquiry being hijacked, as so often happens lately on this site, to be just another forum for swapping funny stories about when that happened at our place. I'm sorry, but there is a time and a place for this type of humour. The same poster also replys telling me we have to deal with the individual head on, I mean for crying out loud, isn't that what we (the company) are trying to do? I posted my inquiry hoping to get a serious reply to a very very serious and sensitive problem with some guidance on possible approaches to a satisfactory outcome for all the parties involved. I am not fresh out of the box, I have got over 20 years work experiance, I just haven't come across an issue like this before. Thats what this forum is for to seek advice from our peers to try and avoid making mistakes that may have serious consequences. And finally, (you might say thank God) there are a number of options open to a company to dismiss an individual in this situation, off the top of my head (not over it as mentioned by a previous poster) they could be a case made for this particular problem being, anti-social, causing offence to fellow workers (which it is), disregared for the safety of others (yes - he is using the same canteen facilities, toilets, etc. as others, remember he comes into contact with sewage - Hep A, etc). Thanks again for the serious responses, no thanks for the 'humour'. Liam
Admin  
#17 Posted : 16 December 2004 12:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel Hammond I don't know your management structure. If this was at my work, my first thought would be; What about the person's line manager? Isn't it the line manager's job to follow the disciplinary route if other approaches fail. Sorry if I'm stating the obvious but isn't it like any other disciplinary procedure - initial verbal warning, then written warning etc...? I know this is easier said than done because the whole thing is awkward and embarrasing - far easier for the line manager to refer it to H&S or HR - but that is shying away from sorting out the problem.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 16 December 2004 22:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason Touraine Absolutely. Why would this need the h&s adviser? Surely there are more important things in your in-tray. And why do so many have time to pontificate on it. Maybe Clarkson is right about this profession.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 17 December 2004 10:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Allen It is interesting to see that so many people are sitting in their ivory towers with their heads in the sand (or indeed with their heads stuck up something else!). We are (or should be) H&S Managers. The most important and difficult part of our remit is the final word in the title. Anyone who is not prepared to roll their sleeves up and tackle problems won’t be part of the management team for long. Ignoring any problem which doesn’t fit into neat discipline boundaries won’t make it go away (and probably does more to get us a bad name than anything else). People’s first reaction to smells, whether they come from the drains, something they work with, or another person, is that they are a health problem. I agree this isn’t entirely an H&S issue but isn’t entirely an HR one either. What if the person concerned is a contractor? Is it Contracts Department responsibility to sort it out then? The issue requires a cross boundary approach at the very least. A fellow professional is asking for help and all we do is fire off stories about scrubbing people in troughs or worse say it’s not our responsibility. You aren’t paid for the easy jobs – you’re paid for the difficult ones that don't fit into neat boxes, or you shouldn’t be paid at all!
Admin  
#20 Posted : 17 December 2004 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight I entirely agree with the last comment in it's general application; this is still an HR issue though, John
Admin  
#21 Posted : 17 December 2004 10:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PaulA John... I couldn't agree more by your statement that we are not there to do an easy job.... but then why make the job even harder by 'pussy footing' around issues... Management is in place and has the responsibility to tell the individual concerned that there is a problem with his/her hygiene standards. Obviously if the H&S manager bags the job then he/she should use the best skill learnt by all H&S professionals... tact and diplomacy using developed inter-personal skills to tell the individual. OR.. a chat perhaps by a friend/colleague will be far better received by the offender than written/public warnings. In the Services we are expected to keep personal hygiene standards and do so at both Zero arctic temperatures and +60 in the Gulf. You would expect a work colleague to give you a heads up should you fall short of the socially expected. Everybody has different body odours and levels of 'scents', but a lot of people that do smell at work would rather be told by a mate than management... Some issues are emotive and they are not easy to deal with but just call for those extra skills that H&S professional may qualify themselves with… Regards Paul
Admin  
#22 Posted : 17 December 2004 11:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Angela Hayden Hello Lian, This is the first time I have replied or commented on any issues posted, but felt I had to as I sympathised with your cause. I too, after looking at a few of these forums found that they are being used "to have a go" and not for the real purpose. I do not have much advice to offer and have never been in this situation before myself, but unfortunately it does sound like you will probably be the best person to handle it as you sound like a sensitive, approachable and diplomatic sort of person. And I take my hat off to you for admitting you need some guidance, rather than jumping in feet first. All I can offer is perhpas try to find out a little bit more about the person and his personality, possibly through his close work mates(I assume he must have some, maybe try to speak to them confidentially to see if there are any particular issues that he has in his personal life and ask them if either they could have a quite word or ask their advice on how they think it might be best handled. What I am trying to get at is that you are going to have to deal with the situation and you will need to be as armed as you can with as much information as possible, with a clear strategy on how to approach it. Sorry, I don't envy you, or him for that matter. A lot of his response will depend on his personality, as I am sure you will handle it in the best way possible. Good luck, Let us know how you get on. Ang.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 17 December 2004 11:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Liam Nolan Hi, Thanks for all the constructive replys since my last post. I find myself agreeing with all of them. My initial reaction when I was asked to advise on the issue was that it was a HR problem, however I said I would check it out with you guys (and gals) to be sure (I have also asked local experts as well). It was passed to me because the company Doctor told the HR manager that he should talk to the Safety Officer (me). Someone mentioned management structure, I don't have the time nor do you, for me to try to detail it. Anyway I have to 'work the system' in place. I will be handing it back to HR, even though there are some (dare I say) peripheral H&S issues. I am not disregarding these H&S issues just to duck having to deal directly with the issue, rather I don't have the authority to start disiplanary action - thats HR (there must be some coersion in order to try to show the serious view the company is taking, and this unfortunatly is probably disiplanary action - remember I mention the individual has already been spoken to on this issue). Also, you will agree with me (I hope) when I say HR people are (or should be) trained to deal with people, that's their job after all. I would suspect you have guessed our HR manager is trying to evade the issue as well. I have already told the HR manager my intial reaction (the canteen & toilet sharing) on the H&S aspects that I could see. Another poster mention about the individuals personal life. Yes this occured to me as well. He comes from a farming background, and while I don't have any details on his home conditions, then possible the facilities at home may not be great. He may not have both parents alive and (here I may be accused of being sexist, sorry) possible his mother may not have the facilities to wash clothes every day, it could be his up bringing that his work clothes should last him the week. etc. I have always been thought (with regard to H&S) that care does not end at 5 o'clock, the physical effects of a persons work may extend to other times and areas of his life and these have to be taken into consideration. As mentioned before in this thread, there does not seem to be a COP on this issue, and from the posts in this thread, there seems to be losts of this type of situation in the workplace. Maybe the powers that be (in HR or Buisness end of things not H&S) have procedures to deal with occurances. Again thanks for the replies. Liam
Admin  
#24 Posted : 17 December 2004 12:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Liam, Best of luck in getting your reluctant HR person to take this on. Just a thought; although there isn't a COP on this it could be dealt with in the same kind of way as sensible clothing, alcohol use and so on. That is, there could be some sort of statement in a staff handbook, or even in the contract, that employees conduct, dress and attitude at work should not be offensive to their fellow employees or members of the public. This would then, being part of the contract, be reasonably easily enforceable (though of course it couldn't be used in contexts which fell foul of equal opps or anti-discrimination laws). Exactly how it would be worded in order to encompass smelly workers would need some thought; perhaps a requirement for appropriate dress and personal hygiene would do. Don't know what you think but that's how I would guard against this sort of thing in future, John
Admin  
#25 Posted : 17 December 2004 13:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly Liam, If there is a family breakdown, ie Mother, (how dare she) may be working and has obviously not got her priorities right in not sorting out her son's washing then HR may be able to recommend a short course in how to switch on a washing machine for this young lad. Failing tha if the family situation is that dire then I suggest a call to Social Services may help. Regards Jennifer
Admin  
#26 Posted : 17 December 2004 14:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Skelding May I suggest Kim & Aggie from Channel 4's "too posh to wash" they seem to make a difference to soap dodgers!! On a serious note, the individual may not have been brought up with a full understanding on how he should conduct himself in the washing/self cleansing/hygiene areas. We all have didn’t views on when we need to wash, and this all stems from childhood; Based on the instruction we received (get to the bathroom and clean behind those ears!!) and how we were trained (this is soap, mix with warm water and apply to dirty areas!!) supervised (get back in the bathroom and finish the Job!!) and reviewed (how much soap, aftershave and deodorant has been used!!) I think combined with some simply education on the matter (perhaps a sit down with the person to ascertain how he perceives washing and basic hygiene), tell him the benefits (more girlfriends, happy colleagues) explain the shortfalls (various bacteria that grows on the body and the harm it can cause, unhappy colleagues!) and reinforcing company procedures for personal hygiene and training him on them, I’m sure everything will be coming up roses sooner than you think. In addition, the benefits this time of year also means cheaper box sets of soap and aftershaves, I’m sure he could be the lucky winner of that raffle prize for Christmas!!! There you go, a little humour, a little advice, we are human after all!! I'm off to get a shower, Happy Christmas to all
Admin  
#27 Posted : 17 December 2004 16:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eric Burt Liam In your posting you have stated that the Personel Manager has been dealing with this individual. If I were you I would leave it at that. The Personnel Officer will know the Employment Law relating to constructive dismissal i.e. if this employee feels he is being treated in such a way that he has no option but to leave, then the company may find itself facing a constructive dismissal claim. You may also want to check out the Data Protection Act. Publishing personal details which can identify an individual and then speculating about their background etc on a public forum is not exactly the best course of action. Eric
Admin  
#28 Posted : 17 December 2004 20:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Hi Again Liam. In my posting I was suggesting taking firmer action, and like some others above indicated, that in different circumstances, such as the military, a different approach might be employed, but I indeed warned of the problems of doing so and did not condone such action. If the problem still exists, I think the personnel department should get the chap in for an interview with more senior management, in a discrete manner of course, to let him know fairly and squarely that the situation cannot be permitted to continue, particularly as the remainder of the workforece is being affected by his 'personal hygiene' - or in this case lack of it, and that this is causing problems in the workplace (he should be told!!) There are no policies for such matters, such instances must be dealt with as and when they occur, but there are various options that could be taken if, after being spoken to by more senior management, his personal hygiene does not improve, for example: 1) Consider banning the chap from communial areas if his hygiene is not to a suitable and acceptable standard, and may effect the other persons using the facility or indeed if his clothing is soiled and should not be in those areas, 2) Isolating him, to work in an area where he is not in close contact with others to the degree that he will effect them in their work, 3) Suspending him from work (without pay - his failure to meet acceptable standards) if improvements are not forthcoming after agreed date until such time as they are, 4) If no improvements (as above at 3) moving towards full disciplinary process I think warning letters would be advisable following an interview with more senior management, and if they cannot get to the seat of the problem and get improvements over an agreed period, moves such as those above will either; a) Cause him to look at changing his personal habits to get back into the fold, or b) Perhaps consider his position and his need to comply or perhaps risk loosing his job! Just a though.... does this chap have any allergies? to soaps shampoos etc... it might be worth exploring all the options during an interview just to make sure you cover all the ground.... Hope this gives some more food for thought... Stuart b)
Admin  
#29 Posted : 18 December 2004 11:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David J Bristow Hi Liam What is required here is a subtle approach perhaps from a female member of staff that might be seen as a matriarch and someone the person might take notice off. When I was in the army many years ago we were called to the parade ground, when we were all in line and standing to attention the sergeant major whispered into the ear of the corporal. The corporal then screamed Jones your mothers dead, with that the young lad fainted. Six moths later we were called to the parade ground, when we were all in line and standing to attention the sergeant major whispered into the ear of the corporal. The corporal asked all those with fathers to step forward – we did but then the corporal screamed “Jones were are you going”. The old ones are the best eh. A difficult subject to broach, perhaps as it is nearing Christmas a hamper of deodorant might do the trick. All have a good one. Regards David B
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.