Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Karen L Duggan
I am relatively newly qualified and would appreciate some help this afternoon from someone with lots of experience in reducing exposure to solder fumes. I have safety data sheets etc but just wish to ensure a proper safe balance between control and production.
Any help would be gratefully received. There are a few issues and I would appreciate the chance to discuss these with someone.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Michael Hayward
One of the main problems is related to t6he rosin based (colophony) fumes which are well known as a cause of occupationally induced asthma.
I suggest you look at local exhaust ventilation at bench level, or you can get soldering irons with built in exhust ventilation at the tip, where the fume is vented away to a filter unit located at some suitable position
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kate Graham
Rosin-free solder is available (we've recently switched to it with no apparent problems).
Kate
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Gary L
Hi
I would suggest that you consider the degree of exposure to the fume. If the operator is only exposed for very short periods then a full bench mounted LEV may be excessive & tip extraction would be better. If solder use is very infrequent then good mechanical ventilation in the area may suffice; however you would have to bear in mind the Maximum Exposure Limits of 0.05 mg m-3 (over an eight-hour reference period); and 0.15 mg m-3 (over a 15-minute reference period).
Early indications of exposure are watery and prickly eyes, runny or blocked nose, a sore throat, coughing, wheezing or breathing difficulties. These symptoms may start within minutes of exposure or be delayed for a number of hours. Rosin-based solder flux and its fume can also cause dermatitis so suitable precautions to avoid skin contact should therefore be taken.
Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Karen L Duggan
Thank you all for your input. Due to the fact that this particular process is to be very short term I feel that investment in LEV is not reasonably practicable. Therefore I have been concerned to segregate the operator by virtue of PPE and to use the least offensive flux. This has been part of the dilemma : selection of the right breathing PPE and a choice between two rosin-free fluxes, both of which have significant quantities of zinc chloride.
My instinct tells me that I would still need to measure fume concentrations after PPE was provided to ensure the risk was suitably reduced?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.