Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 January 2005 14:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Shane Johnston An employee had an accident almost two years ago. He reported the accident at the time, but not the fact that he had fractured a rib. He did not take time off and was able to undertake his normal duties. He is now making a claim against us, which we will process as normal ... my question is do we need to complete a RIDDOR, as we have now been made aware of the fracture, even though the accident was two years ago ? I suspect we do.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 January 2005 15:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Shane, I too suspect you probably do; though I'm not entirely sure what purpose will be served as all the ministerial number crunching for the year in question has already been done. Ours not to reason why... John
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 January 2005 15:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young Check with the HSE info line tel; 0870 1545500 for guidance
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 January 2005 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Ron is quite right, HSE will be the final arbiter of this, but as an analogy, we had an employee fall off a garden swing (Care Home Garden, she was at work), hurting her knee. She didn't take any time off though reported the incident using the appropriate procedures. Some 18 months later she had to have an operation and needed time off for this. There was a very clear connection between the incident and the operation, and this was reportable despite the lag. This isn't quite the same as not knowing about the extent of an injury because the information was withheld, but it is analogous, John
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 January 2005 23:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason Touraine Re your response, John, I wonder whether the hospitalisation 18 months after the accident was actually reportable (though I have no evidence that it is not the case). It does seem odd, though, that if the person had died 18 months after the accident it would not have been reportable. (I think its the courts rather than the HSE which is the final arbiter!)
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 January 2005 09:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Jason, It's true that a death has to occur within twelve months to be reportable, but the time off can be any time after the event provided there is a clear link. Reporting death is actually subject to time limitation in Reg 4, the other reportable occurrences are not limited by this regulation. And yes, it's also true that the courts are the final final arbiter, but if you do what HSE tell you they probably won't take you to court, John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.