Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 January 2005 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Ball I have a member of staff who has been involved in a violent incidents in His/her private life. As an organisation that works with the public the individual is worried that he/she might be at risk whilst at work. Their work would usually involve lone working and home visits. As their employer I want to reduce the risk to my member of staff and other staff/ users of our service. The risk is not under our control, removing the need for lone working, would put another member of staff at risk, potientially increasing the risk. Any ideas?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 January 2005 09:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Bircham Hi Hazel, I must agree with the two previous postings. Opening up a list of potentials could tear this organisation apart. People clash over issues in H&S all the time, primarily over matters of detail rather than principle. If this were to happen, simple questions come to mind. Would the ‘accused’ know the identity of the accuser?. How would the panel reach a decision? Would that not be tantamount to them reviewing our decisions, being pushed to make a decision (aka take sides)? No, a falling out with the wrong people could easily scupper a personal career. Each person who did that would know doubt tell 10 others how poor IOSH is. I would however, suggest that we raise the profile of the Code of Conduct. This allows one of our number to make a complaint against another, but within the bounds of a structured approach requiring sound evidence to support such a claim. For those who have not read the Code of Conduct (shame on you – it is part of your ‘conditions’ of calling yourself MIOSH) it does make interesting reading! Regards Bill
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 January 2005 09:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Bircham WHOOPS forgot to hit copy, ignore previous post, read this one! Richard, A difficult one, as evidenced by the lack of responses so far perhaps. I must admit to not being an expert in this area, but a few points do come to mind. Firstly, although the staff member experienced this incident outside of work, I gather that as they work alone in public areas, their assailant could catch up with them in public and repeat the assault, or worse. Fact – you are aware of this incident and the possible risk of reoccurrence. Fact – you are required to look after the health, safety and welfare of the employees, welfare now accepted as including their mental state. Ask yourself a simple question, if you continued to allow / ask the employee to work alone, in public, is there an increased risk of the employee suffering in any of the above areas? I think the answer would be yes. Now – taking a leap of faith. Can I assume you routinely teach people how to avoid conflict and support this with a counselling service? If so I would suggest that you amend the employees duties to ensure that the realisation of the risk is reduced, and that you engage the resources of the counsellors in helping the employee through the personal issues. If you don’t have supply this sort of training / support, you seriously need to think about it. Given that you do, and you put the employee through the support services, I envisage two likely outcomes. Either the personal problem will be resolved and you will have a grateful, loyal and motivated employee. OR Sadly if the problem does not go away and reaches the stage where it’s impact upon the continued employment is such that it cannot continue, you will have done all that a reasonable employer could have done under the circumstance. The position of your organisation, and perhaps your own conscience, will be that little easier. A harsh reality, but one that cannot be ignored. So having started out by admitting I’m not an expert in this area, these thoughts are offered in the hope that they may help. Good luck, perhaps you could come back to us all when it’s resolved with your experiences. Regards Bill
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 January 2005 10:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Ball We do have and EAP system and the individual does recieve handling difficult situations/ personal safety training.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.