Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 January 2005 15:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lorraine Shuker Am looking for some advice. I am wondering whether to tackle a fire risk assessment myself or get some expert help in. I work in an fairly low hazard office environment so how difficult is it?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 January 2005 18:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ged Hi Lorraine, There is a very good book that for a change is not too expensive by JALITE tel 01268 242300 this book was recommended to me by a fire inspector as one of the best on the market, it covers other things as well and is extremely comprehensive Cost 9.95p the book is called Means of Escape Fire safety audit a guide for basic Fire Risk Assessment. Cheers Ged
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 January 2005 19:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Lee Fire Safety an Employers Guide, I think you can download it from HMSO.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 January 2005 23:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sylvia Tyler Lorraine - for offices quite easy to do using guidance. I think there is an update happening this year though. The hardest part is the compartmentation, ie looking in ceiling voids, and the risk of fire spread ensuring service ducts etc are sealed to prevent smoke spread. I will e-mail you a copy of fire risk assessment for an office I have carried out and has been accepted by the Fire Officer on his visit, resulting in exemption from certification. Is your office covered by a fire certificate? If so when you have done the assessment (and implemented any outstanding controls) perhaps you can call in your local fire officer and ask for his comments. I attended an IOSH course Fire Risk Assessment - it was excellent. I will let you have details of the trainer, it may be something that you can consider for CPD. I have several schools I'm responsible but will call in a "Fire" professional for them! Sylvia
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 February 2005 09:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lorraine Shuker Thanks to everyone who has been sending me things on this. Much appreciated Lorraine
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 February 2005 14:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julie Geairns Sylvia Could I be cheeky and ask you to email me a copy too as I am in the same boat as the first 'postee'. Many thanks in advance Julie
Admin  
#7 Posted : 01 February 2005 14:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Julie Geairns Hi there I was looking for some guidance on how best to set up health and safety committee meetings. I know what should be on the agenda but would like to know best practice on how to go about selecting people to serve on the committee - I know that there should be an even balance between management and staff. Any advice would be appreciated. I am trying to persuade my reluctant boss that this is a good idea! Thanks Julie
Admin  
#8 Posted : 01 February 2005 14:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul L Williams Lorraine, I have sent you a direct email, which has attached a fire audit/risk assessment and a daily inspection checklist. Hopefully these will be of some use to you. Regards Paul Williams
Admin  
#9 Posted : 01 February 2005 19:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Driver 'The hardest part is the compartmentation, ie looking in ceiling voids, and the risk of fire spread ensuring service ducts etc are sealed to prevent smoke spread.' Are you sure this is needed in a fire risk assessment?
Admin  
#10 Posted : 01 February 2005 21:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie Like Pete I too thought that this was a bit over the top. For an office environment I would keep it simple - "Exit routes and widths are adequate for the numbers and physical abilities of the people at risk, there are adequate means of detecting fire, there are adequate first aid fire fighting appliances and personnel have been trained in their use (If applicable), there are adequate means of raising the alarm and evacuation procedures are regularly exercised. Likelihood - Possible, Severity - Cuts and Bruises, Action Nil. Review in 12 Months." That usually satisfied my fire inspectors from the fire service, LA, insurers, etc. One of the problems with risk assessment is that people insist on treating it as some form of black art, when in reality it can be nothing more complicated than dipping your elbow in Baby's bath water. However, you might need something a bit more comprehensive for doing an underwater weld on a North Sea rig! Laurie
Admin  
#11 Posted : 01 February 2005 23:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sylvia Tyler Compartmentation and prevention of smoke spread - identified as missing from my fire risk assessment by the fire authority. I like you thought it would not be so important in an office!! I have heard that fire risk assessments will need to be more robust and include this type of information, but I haven't seen anything in writing to support this. If I'm giving help I've mentioned everything it's up to the person who receives it to make a decision on whether they have gaping holes around service pipes in their office which means despite fire doors etc smoke will spread through the building. Just food for thought. Regards Sylvia
Admin  
#12 Posted : 02 February 2005 09:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tom Clark Hi Lorriane Here's another good site for info - I'm not advertising BT by the way. www.fpa-fireriskassessment.com Regards Tom
Admin  
#13 Posted : 25 February 2005 16:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shirley I would email you our risk assessment if I could find a way on this site to do it!
Admin  
#14 Posted : 25 February 2005 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman To send an e-mail to someone on this chat show, if their name is blue then just click on it and your e-mail programme should open automatically, with their adress in the "to" line. If the name is not blue then they have not supplied an e-mail adress. So you can't
Admin  
#15 Posted : 09 March 2005 10:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever In response to the need to identify the possibility of fire spread via gaps in walls, doors etc. There is most definitely a need to consider this as part of the fire risk assessment. This is a specific issue being addressed in the RRO Fire Safety legislation which is going to be intorduced soon (don't hold your breath!). I agree that offices are generally low risk and that occupants are likely to be able to exit safely in the event of fire. But don't forget, some people have to enter a burning building. I've been involved in a building fire where it has collapsed on me. It is not just gaps in walls etc where fire may spread, the use of incorrect door furniture on fire doors e.g. digital locks will render a fire door no longer compliant and may assist the spread of fire. All of these things must be considered in your fire risk assessment Approved Document 'B' of the Building Regs has a whole section dedicated to internal fire spread in buildings. Surely we are not supposed to ignore it!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 04 April 2005 15:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan F Cox Anyone contemplating carrying out a Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) should get themselves a copy of PAS 79 from BSI. This is the nearest thing presently available to a "Standard FRA" Obviously there are many different forms available and no matter which one you use you will always get one Fire Officer who will not like a certain part or thinks that something else should be included. At least if you use the one produced by BSI you will be working to a nationally agreed standard. The question as to who should carry out the FRA is another problem area and one which you need to think about in great detail. I would suggest that it is not like carrying out a DSE or MH Risk Assessment as the consequences can be far more serious. If you do it yourself I would suggest that you need to consider some specialised training from an approved organisation. If you consider an external consultant don't just think that because a person has been in the Fire Brigade he will know all about FRAs. And don't assume that someone with MIOSH is automatically the right choice either. Alan F Cox
Admin  
#17 Posted : 04 April 2005 15:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Jackson To reiterate a few of the points above. Yep, things like ceiling voids should be included on any fire risk assessment. And don't take MIOSH/RSP or competence in other forms of risk assessment as indicating a competence in FRA. Membership of the IFE is a useful guide.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 04 April 2005 16:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jon Bradburn This has made interesting reading for me. We moved sites in December 2003. At the initial inspection by the fire authority the assessments were very well regarded despite having no reference to voids etc. Our greatest problem in this respect lay with building control who made a major issue of badly placed fire curtains. Pending legislation notwithstanding our procedures allow for a very early detection and rapid evacuation. Great for people - saving which is the primarly concern of the fire brigade. Consider the total loss of a building though and its implications I shall certainly review our assessments!!
Admin  
#19 Posted : 05 April 2005 09:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan F Cox One of the key things to consider with any Fire Risk Assessment is why you are doing it. There are two important aspects to consider at the outset and these are Life Safety and Property Protection - whilst of course there is an important link between the two you do need to establish which one you are trying to satisfy. If Life Safety is your primary concern concentrate on those things that really matter eg Means of Escape, Fire Alarms, Emergency Lighting, Housekeeping etc. If, on the other hand you also wish to include Property Protection, consider things such as Fire Suppression Systems, High Sensitivity Smoke Detection Systems and Post Fire Cleanup. I generally advise people to include both aspects as this is the most cost effective way of carrying out a FRA. Alan F Cox
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.