Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John
Hi.Everyone,
My boss is a bit concerned that hand written risk assesments are a nuisance to write out and would rather have a tick box type. I've explained to him that the range of different hazards, activities and control measures in different industries would make it too difficult to formulate this type of assessment but I am throwing it out to the IOSH community to see if anyone has any ever come across a suitable form. We have over 30 different people involved in writing assessments, some are articulate and write well, others are not.
Thanks, John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tom Clark
Tick boxes are OK as long you have all the control measures in place. Some bosses don't like the idea of having records of further control requirements being required - especially if they cost and they don't intend to put them in place anyway.
I take it that all those responsible for filling in the risk assessment sheets have had the same briefing?
Why not use the method of mixing tick boxes with a bit of writing?
Regards
Tom
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tom Doyle
Hi John,
I think Industrial Safety Integration may have just what you are looking for. You can check out the CIRSMA risk assessment system at www.industrialsafetyintegration.com.
Tom
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Impey
Hi John,
I would e-mail you a range of my forms.
Cheers,
Ron
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
In my opinion, the approach to risk assessment depends on the severity of the hazards and of the scale of risks involved.
As hazards may be relatively objective, you are likely to have a fair degree of reliability about the ratings given by diffrent people.
However, risk levels to some extent depend on the perceptions of the rater; tick boxes may not be adequate.
In the event that some of the people exposed to risk have a disability (which may not be adequately recorded by the employer), exclusive reliance on ticking boxes reinforces an exisitng deficiency. As you will be aware, risk assessments which fail to record physical and cognitive disabilities may leave the employer open to a claim for damages with no standard ceiling on the award.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
If you have that many people spending a fair proportion of their time undertaking risk assessments, then perhaps your Organisation should explore the benefits of commercially available 'packages' available as CD-ROM, etc.These may help with consistency, provide permanent legible records, and have add-on benefits such as management review tools?
It is possible to use technology to both undertake and access these assessments in the field using palm tops. etc?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Risk assessment is not about paperwork, it is about process; as a previous respondent indicates, provided the risk is effectively controlled (with all that that implies) then the process has been a success. On a practical level, since assessments must have a record where there are more than five employees, why not introduce different recording systems for different needs? Where hazards are clearly defined and easily controlled a crib-sheet with prompts and tick boxes will work nicely; in more complex areas where more skill and judgment might be needed use a more complex recording tool which encourages a more explicit application of thought,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By ken cook
Please don,t forget at the end of the day a risk assessment has to be suitable and sufficient
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John
Thanks to all for your kind responses and help.
Much appreciated.
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.