Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 12 February 2005 08:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By LIM BOON KHOON A registered safety officer works in a shipyard. He is asked by his employer to perform the functions of a safety assessor for confined space work. (Note: His employer has not appointed him as a competent person although required by the shipbuilding and shiprepairing regulations) An explosion happened on the vessel killing 7 people. He was prosecuted in court for negligence under the regulations. Likewise his employer or occupier was also prosecuted. Under such a circumstance, can his license as a registered safety officer be affected by the prosecution, although he was prosecuted in his capacity as a safety assessor. Is his employer or occupier totally liable for failing to comply with the shipbuilding and shiprepairing regulations, in that the employer or occupier has not appointed him as a competent person ? Given the above circumstances, how can the registered safety officer defend himself in the court of law ? I would like to hear the views, comments and advice of fellow members and other interested parties. Best Regards Lim Boon Khoon
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 February 2005 12:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Allan St.John Holt As he/she has been prosecuted, what was the result? The situation you describe would not happen here, as the regimes are quite different insofar as rhe registration system in Singapore does not resemble the UK position. But it's always interesting to hear what happens elsewhere! Best wishes, Allan
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 February 2005 18:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Allan St H is correct in that it wouldn't happen in the UK now. I thought that intitially I was reading a variation on the HMS Glasgow fire in the 1970's and was confused about the "registered safety officer". There are no direct parallels in the UK but it is possible that Singapore law is sufficiently close to UK to consider the cae of Nurse Woodruffe which was recently cited in one of the H&S publications. It occurred in Essex, that's why I know about it. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 February 2005 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By LIM BOON KHOON Hi Allan and Frank Thanks for the response. The company and the safety assessor are appealing. The court has not sat for the appeal. It is interesting to note about the case of Nurse Woodruffe. Could you please advise the H & S Publication or e-mail me a copy at helpc@helpc.com.sg My posting was prompted by (1) a thread which I read some months ago about Safety Professionals wearing many titles (2) to generate discussion amongst fellow members on this issue. Best Regards Lim Boon Khoon
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 February 2005 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Waldram IOSH International Dept. are aware of this Singapore case, and have asked an experienced member who lives and works there to report in detail when he is in UK in April. The key issue of course is competence, both initial and continuing, how that is maintained and, in the case of the Singapore Government Register assessed. The Ministry of Manpower do require Registered Safety officers to undertake CPD, but personally I'm not aware how their requirements match the new IOSH scheme which begins later this year, or other global good practice.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.