Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paula BrattonYoung
Okay - I know I'm opening myself up to a barrage of abuse for this, but will someone PLEASE explain the use of a hard hat when you are on top of a unit with nothing and no one above. When I've asked before I've had the following responses:
"health n safety, luv"
"could get hit by a low flying [insert type of bird]" (v. common)
"because the law requires it"
"because he might fall off the scaffolding"
"did you see casualty last month?" (no, I didn't understand that one either...)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Eliminates sunburn to scalp.
Prevents trip hazard caused by putting hard hat on roof.
Stops hard hat being accidently kicked off the roof.
Stops hard hat from being pinched by other workers.
Provides protection on ground & during access to roof via scaffolding.
Prevents head being struck by carried items (scaffold poles, roof sheeting etc.)
Prevents hard hat from being recycled as per the other thread.
I'm sure I've missed the punchline, but there are 7 guesses at the answer for you.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Re. point 6, pedants will note that it doesn't prevent the head being struck, but mitigates the damage caused by the head being struck.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Cartridge
Paula,
What happens when the operative comes off the unit, where he has not been wearing a Hard Hat?
In my experience, the operative will then enter a Hard Hat zone with no head protection.
Food for thought.
Regards
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Neil Stephens
Paula is spot on - having some areas on sites where a h hat is required and others where it is not invariably leads to them not being worn when they should be.
By the way the ONLY exemption is for turban wearing Sikhs
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Frank Hallett
Good selection of answers folks.
No-one seems to have picked up on the explicit requirements in the "Hard Hat" Regs for the controller of the activity/premises to undertake a risk assessment to determine those areas and work activities that DO require head protection AND specifically identify what type and level of head protection is required for the activity being considered.
The pragmatic view is that the area will be a "hard hat" area on the basis that it's easier to enforce a blanket instruction; especially where the users may enter areas requiring different levels of head protection during the same work sessions.
Incidentally, turbans tend not to be oil, grease or flame resistant - religious requirement v MHSW, CoSHH, PPE & Head Protection Regs!!!!!
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martyn Hendrie
Sorry to disagree Frank but I think the regs require the controller of the activity/premises to undertake a risk assessment to determine those areas and work activities that DO NOT require head protection
I suspect a typo.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By ken mosley
The obvious one that seems to have been overlooked is the example it sets. The operatives on the rest of the site always state "He's not wearing his hard hat , why should I".
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Very good point Ken.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.