Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 02 March 2005 14:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Drew We are about to commence the removal of paint from steelwork using shot blasting. The work will take place in a ventilated enclosure and the workers will be wearing RPE. CLAW states that the blast removal of "old" lead paint is liable to lead to a significant exposure to lead. The paint was applied in the 1960s and much of it is red oxide or similar. Is this paint "old" and likely to contain a significant amount of lead? I have tried several paint manufacturers and drawn a blank. My perception is that this is unlikely to be a problem. Any information would be gratefully received. Kevin Drew
Admin  
#2 Posted : 02 March 2005 14:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter MacDonald Send a sample for analysis. You should get confirmation one way or the other within 48hrs. You need to be sure as lead exposure through inhaling airborne lead particles (as well as ingestion and absorption) is high when shot blasting. If you are challanged on your assumption that their is no lead present an analysis on paper is the only way to prove your point. Cheers Peter
Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 March 2005 09:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lumpy Forgive my ignorance, but if lead is detected what additional controls could you put in place ? Your operators already wear RPE and other PPE to protect them. The RPE will almost certainly protect against particulates, and I can't see a way of reducing the particulate at source so RPE appears to be your only option. Even if you do send a sample for analysis, can you be certain that that sample is representative of all the shot blasting you do? You may as well just assume lead will be present, I doubt you will need any additional controls. That said you may have additional concerns regarding discharges to atmosphere and waste etc, which you may like to speak to the appropriate authority about.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 March 2005 13:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Drew Lumpy, If the paint is indeed "old" and contains a significant amount of lead then CLAW will almost certainly force me down the route of lead-in-air sampling and lead-in-blood and/or urine measurements of the workers involved. None of this is cheap and if the risk is negligible then why do it? I've no doubt the controls will be adequate but monitoring maybe required. As you rightly say any paint sampling will have to be representative and since we are to process several hundred tonnes of steelwork this is another significant expense. Kevin Drew
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 March 2005 19:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie I have no scientific facts to add at all, but in my engineering days red oxide was universally known as "Red Lead"! There must, presumably, have been a basis for this originally Laurie
Admin  
#6 Posted : 04 March 2005 00:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd The risk is negligable to whom ? Surely you are aware that lead poisoning is cumulative ? Not only is it damaging to those exposed at work, but dust carried away on clothes, hair etyc can cause damage to those that the worker lives with...especially children, who are much more at risk than adults. So, that's the workers. What about those exposed to the dust DOWNWIND of the site/workshop ? What about disposal of the material that is waste from the operation ? I think your attitude is a bit cavalier, to say the least.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 04 March 2005 00:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd Oh, and even if it isn't lead based, it may be zinc chromate, zinc phosphate etc....all are damaging to those exposed.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 04 March 2005 10:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Drew John, Thanks for the insult. Cavalier, I think not. If I were cavalier I wouldn't even be asking the question. Too many late nights for you I think (00:03, how sad is that?). If you read my earlier posting properly you will see that I said IF the risk is negligible which is the whole point of my original question. John, it's all about risk assessment and all I'm trying to do is judge the severity of this particular hazard. No offence taken. Kevin Drew
Admin  
#9 Posted : 04 March 2005 16:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Brede I think you have all the advice you need about getting the paint tested. This will determine whether you have a problem on lead poisoning front or not. In my experience steelwork painted in the 60's is not likely to contain lead. Using red lead or similar compounds was more a feature of Victorian steelwork. My firms problems have always been on the environmental front so we have had to develop sophisticated encapsulation of strucutures so that the dust was contained and did not impact on neighbouring property.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 04 March 2005 19:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd How sad ? Not very....I sleep for about 4 hours most nights and fewer in the summer. More time to do things !! Lead paint continued to be used in commercial applications until the early 80's. See below...ish: 4) Where old lead painted surfaces can be found It is important to recognise that the hazards of lead paint are generally restricted to old painted wooden or metal surfaces. If the house or the building in question has been constructed since the 1970s or the original painted surfaces in an older home or building have been removed and repainted within this period, it is extremely unlikely that lead-containing paints will be present. Prior to the early 1960s white lead (lead carbonate/lead sulphate) was the principal white pigment in primers and topcoats applied to wooden surfaces inside and outside homes and other buildings. Doors, architraves, window frames and sills, stairs and banisters, skirting boards, weatherboards, door frames and barge boards are examples of where lead based paints might be found. Whilst the use of white lead in professional and retail decorative paints was generally replaced by alternative pigments during the 1950s, there was an inevitable time lag in which products in the supply chain continued to be used by professional decorators and do-it-yourselfers after this period. White lead based paints continued to be available to professional decorators for specialist applications, finding uses in commercial properties, public buildings and institutions. Coatings containing low levels of white lead also were used up to the early 80s for the application of a thin primer coat on industrially manufactured, pre-fabricated window and door frames. The use of wbite lead based paints is now restricted by law and they can only be used for the renovation and maintenance of historical buildings and monuments, with prior approval. In addition to the use of white lead in paints for wooden surfaces, some red, yellow, orange or green lead-based pigments (lead chromates) found limited uses in certain coloured gloss paints and wall paints. Decorative paint manufacturers discontinued the uses of these in the early 1970s, tbe pigments being replaced by non-lead alternatives. legislation now prevents the sale of paints containing these pigments to the public. White lead and lead chromates continue to be allowed in artists' colours and specialist model and bobby paints. In the past, other lead-based pigments have found uses in anti-corrosive coatings for metal surfaces. Red lead and calcium plumbate primers might be found on garden gates and railings, guttering and downpipes and other external iron and steel work. Again, the use of this type of coating bas declined in recent decades, as paint manufacturers have introduced alternatives. legislation now prevents the sale of these lead based primers to the public. They are still available for application by professional decorators and for use in industrial processes. They might well be present on articles and items around the home, garage and garden. Whilst safe handling of lead painted surfaces in domestic homes is one concern, professional decorators and builders should also be aware of the possible presence of lead paints in commercial properties, industrial sites and institutional buildings such as schools, hospitals etc and take appropriate precautions when removing or renovating surfaces
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.