Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 March 2005 10:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glynn T Gibson We have a local car company who wants to display cars at one of our local INDOOR events. Empty or Full???? We have intially said that the petrol tank need to be as empty as possible!!! We also said that they need to ensure the car arrives in that state so there is no need to pump out the tank. The car company have replied that the tanks need to be full as possible as this reduces the amount of vapours due to the lack of air space??? Can anyone provide any advice or direct me to some formal guidance - thank you
Admin  
#2 Posted : 16 March 2005 10:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chas I would suggest that you will need to consider whether the Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regs apply if you have the cars full of fuel. You will also need to consider ventilation and spillage procedures, should a tank/hose split.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 16 March 2005 11:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Danny Swygart Try contacting someone with responsibility for safety at motor shows (NEC) for their policy / guidance / procedures.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 March 2005 19:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie What a piece of nonsense. Quite safe to take them, in some numbers, on ships, trains, including very long tunnels, and, still in use in some areas, air ferries, but not an indoor display? Does anyone honestly believe that all car showrooms have petroleum storage licences? Do a normal, reasonable risk assessment and prceed in accordance with the conclusions. On a purely practical note, it is well known in anarchist circles that when filling a petrol bomb you must leave some vapour space for effective propgation within the vessel Laurie
Admin  
#5 Posted : 16 March 2005 19:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Murgatroyd I think the word should be "terrorist" not "anarchist" All modern cars have sealed tanks that only vent to the atmosphere when pressure rises within the fuel tank. It's another emission control measure. They are unlikely to leak, since there is a fuel cut-off that activates when the ignition is turned off.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 16 March 2005 22:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Ex Fire and Rescue Service and would suggest a full tank is safer, but these days with modern cars you should have no problem. Ask your insurers for advice as they will be the ones to pay out should things go wrong.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 17 March 2005 08:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Dimbleby Please, please, please let this be a case for common sense. The car is new, I would presume, or they would not be too willing to show it. It will have passed all manufacturing standards and QA tests. It is just going to stand there and be looked at. Do all the cars in garage workshops have the petrol drained from them.. even when welding on the car.....No . Just let common sense prevail and enjoy the day.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 17 March 2005 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie Sorry John, but anarchists were chucking bombs before the word "terrorist" had ever been invented Laurie
Admin  
#9 Posted : 17 March 2005 15:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Iain W Full, half full or with the obligatory 2 pounds worth of petrol I used to put in when I was an apprentice and it was all I could afford, either that or be tooled up to do a manual handling risk assessment !! - one , two, three - push I know where you are coming from the point of ensuring you are following any required requirements statutory or otherwise, but how would you rate the risk of a brand new car fuel tank splitting - I would suggest low. All new cars go through a PDI check too, so unless the delivery driver has driven off the wrong end of the car transporter !! I don't think it will be much of a worry Why don't you do a risk assessment and contact the company insurer for information, then make your decision after that. I know common sense doesn't necessarily prevail all the time, especially if there was some sort of incident.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 17 March 2005 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Hayward I would suggest you are better off with the taks full rather than empty - an "empty" tank will be full of flammable vapour - far more likely to go bang!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 18 March 2005 15:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pat Burns MIOSH, RSP - SpDipEM - AMIQA If you put a lit cigarette into a full 60 litre tank of petrol it is likely to extinguish. If you put it into a lit cigarette into a partially full 60 litre tank of petrol it is likely that the vapous built up will ignite and possibly cause an explosion. (as they say in the stunt shows please do not try this) The two main risks associated here is fire and spillage therefore your risk assessment should identify the hazards that are likely to result in the incident and what preventative and protective measures are currently in place. Should additional measures be identified then they obviously have to be implemented. Factors to consider include: Current Fire Certificate for building What potentiel ignition sources are there should fuel escape from the fuel system. Supervision. Inspections and checks. Spill procedures. Number and type of persons in premises. Location of stands relevant to emergency exits etc, etc. Believe me it's manageable and not rocket science stuff. If you are unsure then seek some advice from the regulator who in this case will probably be the LA and Fire Brigade.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 18 March 2005 16:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter MacDonald Remember that a banksman will be required when positioning the cars (driver should be an advanced driver with the relevant paperwork and experience) and that a suitable crush barrier is surrounding the car (just in case it's really nice and people gather in a frenzy round it). And check that the inside of the car is not a confined space, consider also deactivating the locks incase a toddler gets stuck inside the car, or panics and drives off (as likely as it spontaneously combusting I suppose). Remember that only the hand brake is preventing the car from rolling away so a specific check should be made on it and recorded. And bear in mind skid marks..... Come on!! COMMON SENSE PLEASE Peter (just lost £40 on the Gold cup, bit frazzled)
Admin  
#13 Posted : 19 March 2005 01:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Ward I agree with Laurie, 30 million cars in the UK all with fuel tanks with fuel levels of full to empty. How many cars in your steet have gone up in flames. Ban smoking and any other types of naked flames. Paul
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 March 2005 11:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight seems the best advice (beyond the sarcasm) is ask the insurers. and how anybody who bets on horse races can use a term like 'common sense' beats me. William Hill got rich; its not rocket science, John
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 March 2005 12:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter MacDonald Come on, betting on horses is more or less Risk Assessment. Anyway, I got my money back on the fixed odds on Saturday. My thanks to Hartlepool. Peter
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.