Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Glynn Thomas
The company I work for have a "understanding" with another company that they can use our FLT (but use their own driver) as and when they need it. I have requested training records from this company to show that their FLT driver is competent but they have refused. I have raised my concerns with the our company but it seems to be falling on deaf ears. What should I do next?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David A Jones
Assuming all your powers of persuasiona re not working:-
Put it in writing spelling out to the persons lending the FLT their legal obligations and the possible consequences of their actions - especially in the event of an incident.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Iain W
In this day and age of "No win , No fee" claims whereby people do not seem to have to be accountable for their actions, I would advise that your company have something more than an "understanding" with this other company.
What if there is an incident and the other company employee is injured and / or results in property damage etc, are your company going to be so understanding when a claim flies in their direction ?
Sounds a bit over the top, but beware informal agreements like this are fine until something goes wrong.
Think of insurance - are the other companies employees covered by you or their insurance when driving your FLT's - probably not - will they pay out if property damage is caused by the other company employee - probably not and will your company be held responsible for any injury incurred while driving your FLT's, yes probably.
I would suggest your company start listening to you and stop the other company using the FLT with immediate effect if they will not supply certification - Friendly understandings will go out of the window if and when any litigation starts. This romance has the potential to end in tears one way or another.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Aidan Toner
Mark if you dont have a signed document from your company to theirs you simply assume no agreement exists and act accordingly by stopping the activity.You can minimise the potential upset by advising in a letter (Your company and theirs) -say 24 hrs in advance -that you intend to do this.Should a letter get cobbled together between your company and theirs,you can then place onus on the signee in your company to verify competency.If he/she does not, just walk away from it by logging it in your own records and in your regular reports to your senior manager and director of safety.
Aye-We are not in for the popularity ratings!!-Good luck
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sylvia Tyler
An hirer of a FLT does not have to request who will be driving it and what level of training they have - perhaps if you draft a "hire" contract with a statement that the client has the responsibility to ensure that any person who operates the machine has received FLT training.
But if the machine is used by the "client" and it is involved in an accident and your employer is not able to use it how much will this cost your company.
I would put your concerns in writing to both your employer and the Md of the company ensuring that they are both provided with the knowledge that any user of a FLT should be qualified - but then I'm use to being unpopular 10 years in the job does that to you!
Good luck
Regards
Sylvia
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.