Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 April 2005 09:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Emma Forbes http://www.telegraphindi...eisure/story_4641904.asp Must admit, I hadn't even thought of this - there have been some suggestions on another forum that we should provide gags for the kids!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 April 2005 09:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze Surely Emma, if the noise in a classroom breaches any action levels, you should be replacing the teacher with one that can exert more control, not providing noise screens. Just a thought.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 April 2005 09:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Yes, fair enough, but remember the old common law duty 'competent and safe fellow employees'; if the teacher can't control the class it could be the employer's fault. No, realistically, the only solution is to replace the children with quieter models; new lo-noyz kids would be a boon to supermarket shopping as well, John
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 April 2005 09:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze But John, If noise is breaching action levels, then this is prima facie evidence that the teacher is not competent and should be replaced with a competent one? A breach of duty would only occur if the school did not replace the incompetent teacher with a competent one. (Of course this all gets a bit messy when the teaching of music is concerned - because by definition that's all about noise.)
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 April 2005 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker If you time weight this, it should be well under the limits. Teachers spend hardly any time in the class room. I bet there is not a teacher in the land who has ever done an 8 hour day in a noisy environment.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 April 2005 14:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight I still feel that we have to tackle the risk at source; if quieter kids aren't possible for technical or moral reasons (boo!!), we could simply go with the flow and stop trying to stop the little fiends from bunking off; no kids, no noise, case solved. sorry if I don't seem to be atking this too seriously, but the last post (time eighting and dilay dose etc) says all that can be sensibly said on this subject, John
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 April 2005 14:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Sensibly said, maybe, but evidently insensibly typed! John
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.