Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Freda Line
I have seen little discussion on OH and realted health and safety issues which have considered the impact of forthcoming age discrimination legislation.
Can anyone signpost me please to some expertise on these issues?
When meeting with a group of OH specialists last year, I was concerned that there seemed such a limited understanding of the potential scope of age laws and in particular on how employers will have to amend policy to possibly protect all employees. In addition I would be keen to hear of any thinking that has been done on the development of 'health, safety & welfare' justifications for discrimination - for instance via protective or care related duty or policy.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
I've not seen much either. Presumably the legal position with regard to discrimination will be along the same lines as that for disability discrimination in as much as any discrimination must be reasonable. Personally' whenever age has been raised in relation to health and safety at work, I have always steered things back to the 'fit for work' and 'competent employee' arguments as these should be the determining factors rather than the age of the individual.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter John Orridge
Most employers discriminate.
Ask any employement agency, the older you are the less chance you have of getting an interview or being offered the post.
If you are over 60 it's not worth filling in the application form.
Peter
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Freda
The International Ergonomics Association contributed to a conference in 2003 on the implciations of the aging workforce.
It included contributions from cultures (especially Japan) where ergonomic risk assessments and adaptations for different age-groups are embedded in workplace cultures.
One reason for the lack of attention to the H & S implications of age discrimination is that the 'leading' interest groups - ACAS and the CIPD - lack much understanding of ergonomic adaptations necessary and economically possible. I attended a seminar organised jointly by them last September and ergonomic adaptations got exactly six words by the CIPD Discimination Specialist (who had earlier not even replied to my email to her, although I'm a Chartered Fellow of the CIPD).
So, wilful refusal to face realiitis on the part of those claiming leadership appears to be a major source of the problem to highlight.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.