Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 May 2005 14:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alias This is a side step from an existing post as I didn't particularly wish to hijack Richie's thread. In there someone suggested that maybe safety professionals are a dying breed who have no confirmed place in the workplace. I'm interested to know people's thoughts on this. I for one feel safety is on the up and up and will grow as a field in the years to come making us more necessary than ever. There already appears to be more jobs than decent qualified safety professionals out there. Lets face it, with the complexity of legislation and science associated with certain aspects of safety, you need a safety professional to orchestrate and provide competent advice or instruction. No doubt businesses can get by without us, but unless they draw on knowledge from elsewhere (consultants for example) I'm sure their safety management will be less than stella compared to what a qualified safety professionalm could provide.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 May 2005 15:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen D. Clarke The British multi-national company I worked for had a safety advisor at each site. When they were taken over by a european multi the first thing the new owners did, before closing several sites, was make a number of advisors redundant. H&S advice etc was subsequently to come from the site manager. Steve
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 May 2005 16:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight This is an interesting question; me I don't think we're endangered as yet, but we have had a period of rapid economic growth which has also seen a rapid growth in H&S and other specialist functions. This may be a coincidence, but if the doomsayers are right and the economy does slow down, will it affect us disproportionately? I mean, in the event of a complete economic meltdown we would certainly all be on the streets, but to what extent are we a bit of luxury, viable only in very good times, and how would a bit of a prolonged slow-down affect us? I'm a little concerned about this and am diversifying as much as I can, John
Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 May 2005 16:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stephen J Smith I am a safety professional and also a consultant. I only get the call when companys are in it sometimes above the neck. So my thoughts are that good professionals won't have a problem, we might have to amend prices but I have a colleague who upped his prices by 50% and got more work, in house guys are a necessaery evil as far as accountants are concerned, never taken too seriously but their advice is usually as good as consultants. Stick with it the more enlightened companys will employ safety professionals the fly by nights won't until theres an issue and then they need them as well. regards stephen
Admin  
#5 Posted : 25 May 2005 19:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney One of the most attention-grabbing of threads I have had the pleasure to contribute to; yes, I suppose we walk the high wire, as we sort the problems out and other key personnel become the so called competent person the conversations at board level surely must be..."do we really need this guy, can't we just do it ourselves and save a small fortune"? Yes they can, sort of, but we all know the real cost to them when things go t**s up as s**ds law enters the frame. I know we don't generate any income, I know we can be a pain in the preverbal, I know we are not on the top of the company bonus payout and Xmas card list, but........... When it happens, oh yes, the sun shines out of it! Lets face it, does any company really understand the true cost if it goes wrong, its a comparison similar to the contractor, "ahh leave it out pal, it won't appen to I, I's bin doin this fer ever and nuffin appened to me", So the same goes for the company; or does it? So where does the argument go for are we going to end up in the same woods as the dodo bird? I suspect not, look at the insurance company implication, no elf an safety geezer/ess triple premium next year, if indeed you can arrange cover, RA's and PTW that are not worth a wink, prepared by crass amateurs that think they are satisfying the variety of regs, the HASAwot never erd of it, can you see where I am going with this, we are not an endangered species, nor will we be, the regs speak for themselves the Management regs 1999 make some solid points with respect to arrangements, all we need to do is our job well, keep em safe an elfy, smile an be ever so umble an we is secure as can be....I think! Mind you got me thinking now............................................ Charles
Admin  
#6 Posted : 25 May 2005 21:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alias I think if the enforcement agencies even did a half decent job of "enforcing" the law (Government's fault mostly) and fines we're reflective of the nature of the crime, industry would be creaming out for h&s to sweep in and save them money, we'd be paid handsomely and seen as a real business need.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 26 May 2005 08:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Lee Alias, would you care to expand on your comments regarding enforcement authorities; "I think if the enforcement agencies even did a half decent job of "enforcing" the law (Government's fault mostly"
Admin  
#8 Posted : 26 May 2005 09:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis As implied by some of the responses above there are question marks about the future of the profession. We cannot continue to be practitioners in the time honoured fashion of being the policeman and the person who organises the supply of safety equipment etc and its maintenance. As we enter the new era of chartered membership we need to address our role and how it is to be performed. For me it is clear that we must in some manner move into the fields of corporate governance, management systems design and implementation and compliance management. We cannot stand to one side and allow others to set the pace in managing businesses whilst we merely service the "mundane advice and do on the shop floor " situations. If we stay at this point we will continue to be reactive instruments of, rather than proactive participators in, good company management. Bob
Admin  
#9 Posted : 26 May 2005 13:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Cartridge I've just got to hop onto this one! with regard to Stephen’s comment & I quote "in house guys are a necessary evil as far as accountants are concerned, never taken too seriously but their advice is usually as good as consultants" Can't agree with you Steve, " necessary evil" "never taken too seriously"? You must have worked for the wrong companies. If you have the full commitment of your company from board level down, you can create a safety culture that people can buy into, & consequently, they are not afraid to speak up if there is a problem. Therefore, the safety professionals are always taken seriously, because they are seen as an integral part of the team, & not a necessary evil. As far as accountans are concerned, what does a "Bean Counter" know about Health & Safety, & weren't we always taught that money & Health & Safety are strange bedfellows. Anyway, that my rant over for the week, back to the padded cell :-) A good Bank Holiday to all Andy
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 May 2005 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alias Lee, My meaning is this. Enforcing authorities are vastly under resourced, and target many of their existing resources towards pro-active work, this I am not necessarily criticising. However what we are left with is a multitude of safety violations that go unpunished; on average it’s years before a business can expect a visit from an EHO, Technical Officer or Inspector. People readily break the law and remain ignorant of it and get away with it. Few are held to account and when they are they are fined a pitiful amount; admittedly smaller companies feel the pinch of a fine; but the average £8,000 fine its not as much as a poke in the arm for larger businesses. I work for a large company enforced by the Local Authority; health and safety here is a hideous joke; we really need to be enforced by the HSE, but we are an exceptional case. People here are regularly faced with activities that can kill or maim and often do result in major injury. Try as I might to change things I am up against 30 years of “getting away with it” and so it is a slow process. The EHO’s come very often, can’t fault them there, say things are terrible and need to change and do nothing about it. No improvement notice or prohibition notice, which as a safety professional I know will act as a swift kick in the butt which we need. Why don’t they get they’re teeth in? I am incredibly disillusioned with the health and safety system of the UK; I have studied this at great length and it was the subject of my university dissertation. I’m afraid we are being failed. We’re the authorities better at education and enforcement, the business would soon place greater value on health and safety and indeed us. The fact that punishment is rarely handed out and when it is it’s not more than a slap across the risk compounds the problem of non compliance.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 26 May 2005 16:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I think alias is sounding rather defeatist. No wonder as the "stick" is not very effective and only has a short term effect anyway. As I said on a previous thread a few days ago, bad safety costs. Good safety makes money. Employeers need to see just how much they can gain (not just in avoiding court cases and fines) by improving training, planning, preparation, by having employees who know what they are doing and who are working to a prepared ssow. The gains are not just in safety but also in quality, environmental protection, efficiency, productivity and cost control. You and I know it makes sense. So why aren't IOSH telling the journalists that ? Merv
Admin  
#12 Posted : 26 May 2005 16:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Lee Alias, cant argue with that pretty much spot on. Theres on average one Enforcement Officer per 1000 premises, impossible to visit every premises every year.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 26 May 2005 19:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alias Merv, I have to wonder in what types of industry and company you work with. I used to be the bounce off the wall, see the bright side of anything, sell safety to the top kind of practitioner. That works in some places, but unfortunately I've had it beaten out of me here by resistence, commercially orientated operations and an unwillingness to put in the work. I can spend the next 5 years slowly changing the culture and hope no one gets killed in the meantime or the Enforcing Authority can sweep in and make the top dogs listen, hmm I think I have a long 5 years ahead.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 26 May 2005 19:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman which industry doesn't matter much. I've done chemicals, engineering, car and truck building, plastics manufacturing and conversion, uranium mining, IBM, papermaking, construction, ... I've even worked in ladies underwear. Current jobs include construction of nuclear submarines and manufacture of plastic page-holders. We have consulted to sites from 30 to 7 000 employees. And we don't advertise. Do a good job, get the accident rate down and friends talk to friends. Do SMS. Make sure they have the technical ressources and comptences, then do BBS. Gets 'em every time. e-mail me direct. Merv
Admin  
#15 Posted : 26 May 2005 21:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton oh dear merv... I wish you hadn't put that thought in my mind. Ladies underwear? Over or under your skirt? An endangered species? No.. Not in the foreseeable. Have you tried counting the number of jobs in the practitioner recently - compared with five / ten / twenty years ago? (yes, I go that far back and further...) I promise, these jobs would not be so abundant if there was any prospect of reducing demand. Competent people are in high demand. Market forces rule - there are simply more vacancies than decent applicants at the moment - thats got to be good news for the good practitioners surely? Steve
Admin  
#16 Posted : 27 May 2005 09:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lumpy Undoubtedly the "old style" H&S Practitioner is on the way out. Those who still "attack" H&S in isolation rather than in conjunction with other management systems, business plans, corporate governance etc. will find it hard managing at top level, and will not convince their Boards that they, or their function, add value. If you are still viewed as a bolt on extra, rather than intergral with the business then you may be surplus to requirements. You need to demonstrate to your Board that Safety is not in conflict with profit, and on the contrary it is good for business. You will not do this by fire fighting, being reactive and telling people "you can't do that". Shane
Admin  
#17 Posted : 27 May 2005 09:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By George Wedgwood Lumpy has it! After all that dialogue he has clarified the whole debate and made it simple. The only way to become a necessary part of the organisation is to add value and become a integrated business partner of the other managers and teams. That way they see you as having the same objectives - not there as a policeman or spy on poor practice - and contributing to the bottom line. In my company they now have management meetings to discuss H&S and make it constructive, talking about behaviour, cost effectiveness, planning, procurement standards - all related to ensuring that the job goes more safely, smoothly and efficiently, therefore generating more savings. Yes, we still get some inujuries but we are learning from each one now instead of simply just rushing adhead to put it down to "must take more care". IOSH wants this type of thinking and cultue change in its Members and I see it IS changing. Let's work harder to make it happen and espouse those values to our employers along with the IOSH 'culture change'. Maybe then they will learn exactly what added value a safety pro can make to their business! George
Admin  
#18 Posted : 27 May 2005 12:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jasonjg Very inspiring and so very true George and Lumpy.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 27 May 2005 13:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Lumpy for president and george can warehouse my stocks any day
Admin  
#20 Posted : 27 May 2005 15:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight I actually saw an adder last night, but it was only four inches long and didn't bite me...oh, sorry, wrong thread...:) John
Admin  
#21 Posted : 27 May 2005 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson if you recognise this 'Tweed jacket, leather patches on the elbows, grey slacks, (not Trousers) brown shoes, clipboard and "stop you cant do that!!!!" then you are no use to business! EHO's dont enforce H&S well because they no nothing about H&S, ecxept the Law!!!! (Ex EHO) Nuff said!
Admin  
#22 Posted : 27 May 2005 19:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Going back a bit, you can't change the safety culture of a business by sweeping in, quick diagnosis, report with action plan and then bugger off and leave them to it. You may get good results in the first few months or even a year but as soon as something important happens to that company it all goes out of the window. We've seen it with new products coming into the plant, changes of plant managers, even strikes. The average manager cannot walk and do safety at the same time. It takes time and lots of TLC to get a solid culture change so that, eventually, H&S is part of the way of life. This means that the safety professional has to look on whatever they are doing as part of a long term project. 4 or 5 years of plugging away in the right dirrection. And you can't be "elbow patches and "you can't do that"". You have to be part of the family and "We can do that a damn sight better if we ....."
Admin  
#23 Posted : 28 May 2005 14:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Higginson I do agree with much of what has been written about proactive health and safety, helping the bottom line, developing cultures etc. but this is only relevant in proactive companies with directors who are interested. There are many organisations out there who are either ignorant of their responsibilities, or don't care. In organisations like this, the only motivator is people telling them they have to do it - supply chain, insurance company, HSE, EHO or whoever. Enforcement is a key (but not the only) part of the health & safety framework in this country and there are worrying signs that it is being watered down. Mr. Brown's recent comments about cutting red tape are particularly concerning. Regards Nick
Admin  
#24 Posted : 30 May 2005 13:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steven Mellor In my ever so humble opinion smaller companies may well 'do away' with the full time professional and start to use the 'chartered safety professional' in the same way that legal professionals are used. Which of course means that we can all charge solicitor type fees. £150 an hour OK for everyone? Steve
Admin  
#25 Posted : 30 May 2005 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman If chartered status means I have to take a pay cut then I'm going home !
Admin  
#26 Posted : 30 May 2005 18:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney Merv Got any vacancies??!! Charles
Admin  
#27 Posted : 30 May 2005 19:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Maybe, but if your only "talking" to the board and not actually on it then you may only qualify for "associate" rather than "principal" consultant. Like wot I am. If you can organise a free life membership for me and the wife then maybe we can negotiate Merv
Admin  
#28 Posted : 30 May 2005 20:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney See what I can do buddy, till then I will ave to put up with me 4.80 an hour.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.