Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 31 May 2005 13:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By sean douglas aggas I am currently trying to enforce the wearing of hearing protection within a designated area (heavy steel fabrication workshop) which has been identified as noise protection area following a noise survey. Due to the nature of work (lifting operations, etc) it is almost impossible to provided screened / barried area's. Unfortunately there are employee's whom insist that they can not wear hearing protection even though I have offered them both external (over ears) and internal (plug into ears) protection. They still INSIST that they connot wear them either through medical reasons (dermititis of the ears) or due to discomfort. Can any one please advise where I stand in relation to The Noise at Work Regs 1989 or any other current Regs if I where to ask them to sign a disclosure stateing they do not wish to wear PPE on either of the grounds I have mentioned and retain in their Personnel File. Our should I insist that they wear the hearing protection. I look forward to any comments / advice. Best Regards Sean Aggas
Admin  
#2 Posted : 31 May 2005 13:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simon Ayee Employees cannot avoid wearing hearing protection by waiver. For guidance on use of ear protection see HSE's publication L108 "Reducing Noise at Work" especially pages 13 -18. If you can't reduce the noise level and the area remains an ear protection zone then ear protection must be worn. If you can't resolve the reason for non wearing then disciplinary action or transfer to other work. You could try and apply to HSE for an exemption but I doubt that you would get one.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 31 May 2005 14:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Elliott Sean - as I see it, if you have a designated noise protection zone - the wearing of ear protection is "mandatory". No if's buts or maybe's - Hearing protection will be worn. If your employees have genuine health issues about wearing the protection, then they can clearly no longer work in the noise protection zone. Alternative employment may have to be considered. Assuming this is all supported by an appropriate assessment of risk and that other controls are genuinely not possible, the refusal to wear protection may be a disciplinary offence. Employees also have a duty to comply with reasonable requests made their employer to enable the employer to comply with his legal duties. Can you not get the employees on your side through the involvement of union safety reps for example.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 31 May 2005 17:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope Have you considered audiometric testing. This could be part of useful education session about the noise risk. Around the middle of next year it might become mandatory for your employees. In any case it might bring the risk closer to home.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 31 May 2005 18:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman May cost a bit up front, but audiometric testing at the beginning and end of each shift, showing employees how much they have lost by not wearing protection today, can be a big persuader. Also Behavioural Based Safety (here we go again) can be used to "recognise and reward" those who do wear hearing protection. If that doesn't work, fire 'em (apply pre-defined disciplinary procedures in full accordance with applicable current legislation) Merv
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 June 2005 19:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett I can onlt agree with the above. The majority of "reasons" put forward for not wearing hearing protection - or any other PPE - simply aren't valid when closely scrutinised. You mention dermatitua [ear infection would be a better description], but this is a personal hygiene issues and should be an integral part of your hearing protection programme. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 June 2005 09:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen D. Clarke Hi, Agree with the above but I would add that as a sufferer of so called dermatitis of the ear I can see the other point of view. This condition is reported to be exacerbated by high humidity which occurs naturally in the ears of some people dependant on wax formation, ear canal shape, canal diameter and many other factors. I would expect ear plugs and defenders to make matters worse. When it flares up untreated it may last for days or weeks, results in reduced hearing acuity, and it can be difficult to make out a telephone conversation. Treatment may only give temporary improvement. Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.