Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 June 2005 16:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Debbie Shepherd
Prior to purchasing relevant documents(several SEMA CoP's and HS(G)76 and BS5950 are the ones I have identified so far), can anyone tell me if there is a minimum frequency for inspecting warehouse racking.
We also have racking outside used for storing boxes with embossing rollers inside - as they are outside should the frequency be increased due to the weather component?

Any help greatly appreciated

Debbie
Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 June 2005 21:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Higginson
Debbie

Not sure whether there is a specific frequency laid down or not.

I would advise basing the frequency on a risk assessment which should consider frequency of use, proximity to vehicles, temperature, weights stored etc. etc.

I have a sample inspection form if you want it.

Kind regards

Nick
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 June 2005 10:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen D. Clarke
Hi,

The following website might help

http://www.therackgroup....ction=posts&fid=3&tid=24

Steve
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 June 2005 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Evans
Would reccomend monthly by yourselves and annually by competent third party unless there are more specific high risk factors then you will need to make a suitable judgement based on risk assessment and previous damage history. Don't forget you will need to prove competence for your own inspectors usually by a sema approved course.
We use SESS and have found them to be very good.

Regards

Mark
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 June 2005 15:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeff Watt
Debbie

I believe you have hit on it, there is no laid down inspection rate to speak of.

I concur with the previous speakers on the subject re risk assessment and use of a third party.

I believe £500 ballpark figure should buy an inspection from a competent group or another route may be your insurance company for a 3rd party inspection? You run the risk that insurance companies can be OTT with their recommendations and you can fall foul of them if you do not comply with what the say.

What I would say is that you can learn a heck of a lot from an inspecting engineer spending some time with you during and after an inspection. Think of the £500 as a cheap combo inspection/training session for you. After they have been through once then you will feel a lot more confident about any risk assessment you carry out in the future because your making judgements from a more informed base of knowledge. Just a suggestion.

Jeff
Admin  
#6 Posted : 10 August 2005 16:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gordon Thelwell
Hello Debbie,

I'm sorry I missed your thread and perhaps by now you are looked after. But if not, and for the benefit of everyone else, please take what you will any of the following information regarding Pallet racking Safety Inspections with regards to your enquiry.

INSPECTION FREQUENCY:
The F.E.M (Federation Europeene de la Manutention - 'The Federation of European Rack Manufacturers to we mere mortals') SPECIFIER'S CODE FEM 10.2.03 Section 9.0 (this standard supersedes S.E.M.A) States:
__________________________________-___
The operator (you) should ensure that arrangements are made for the regular inspections of the storage equipment structure for damage and other dangers.
These inspections should be:

1. on a daily basis by truck drivers and reported to management.

2. at two to four weekly intervals by a management representative responsible for site safety and a written report filed.

3. at least six monthly intervals by a user company engineer or by an external expert, depending upon the general level of damage being sustained. For some high usage situations these professional inspections should be made more frequently.

Formal procedures should be laid down:
- to carry out remedial work on any damage identified
- to isolate critical areas of a seriously damaged installation until remedial work is completed.
______________________________________

Of course Debbie, this should all be taken in the context of PUWER and other RSP's.

Also, the gentleman is quite correct when he said that insurance companies would rightly negate your claim in the event of an ACC/INC if you could not demonstrate that these duties were not carried out. After all, would you pay your car insurance but then neglect to check the tyres, oil, MOT etc?


Secondly with regards to outside Pallet racking FEM Section 5.9 C (Service Temperatures) and 5.10 C (Environment) States:
______________________________________
SERVICE ENVIRNOMENT:
The lowest service temperature is important to establish because of the risk that brittle fracture can increase with decreasing/fluctuating temperatures. Low temperature is especially critical in combination with electro-zinc plated treatment and hydrogen embrittlement of bolts. (There's a quote for HSP if ever I heard one!)
The variation in service temperature is important in ascertaining conditions that may lead to external and interstial condensation forming on the steelwork.

ENVIRONMENT:
Special consideration should be given to hidden metal corrosion affecting the life of such items as painted interlocking box beams when used in moist or corrosive conditions.
______________________________________

In my experience as a Pallet racking Inspector, all externally used pallet racking should be of the galvanised type. Otherwise, the SWL of 'ordinary' racking used outside is non-determinable. Further, where as your usual powder coated pallet racking used in-doors can last up to 20-30 years if looked after, the same pallet racking used outside from new could only be classed as 'safe' for perhaps18 months to 3 years even without damage.

Finally, your reference to BS 5950 is most impressive. The current SEMA damage tolerance is based on this dated standard, which when first established was, I’m sure, the most up to date available.
However, the standard is based on structural members 300mm x 300mm closed box sections that are hot rolled steel. All pallet Racking in this country is thin walled, open section cold rolled steel! Two quite different beasts. Cornell University in the States, as well as The Swedish National Testing and Research Institute have brought this sector into the 21st Century and I would advise you to seek them out. (I have the full Cornell Files that I can email you if you wish) The Swedish files are available free from their website.

I have introduced this topic to the attention of SEMA, but sadly to no avail. After all, SEMA stands for the Storage Equipment MANUFACTURERS Association and introducing a risk based analysis to pallet racking would no doubt affect their bottom line.

I've gone on long enough, though I could go on....and on....and on!

I hope this helps Debbie. Please contact at anytime if you need any further specifics. This invitation is extended to all.

Keep safe.

Gordon.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.