Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alex Ryding
Well, I'm not sure what you’ve all found, but a pair of kinky boots on the cover of this months SHP has proved very popular. I always leave the magazine at the end of my desk so passers by or people coming to talk to me can have a look, on occasion one or two people may pick it up; this month, floods of people! I've had at least 20 people since I opened it yesterday! Could this be the new format for raising the profile of safety?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adam Jackson
Very disappointing when you open it though. I was hoping for an in depth article on the inherent dangers found in the kinky sex trade.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lorraine Shuker
sex can sell anything it seems .. even safety!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Black
This thread is very disappointing since it reinforces the stereotype of safety practitioners who just don't get out enough (including me). Paradoxically, it is also immensely heartening to see evidence that my fellow professionals are as bereft of excitement and enduring the same sad existence as I am.
At least all the crud they put in the plastic liner served a purpose for once by obscuring said salacious image, I have kids you know! Perhaps a brown paper bag might be in order next month.
This is the first time I have ever looked at the front cover. What is the front part of SHP about and who is it directed at anyway? I have only ever looked at the last 40 pages!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John-Mark
So you only look at the jobs too then?
JM
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Chris Knagg
I can't find an order form or reader enquiry contact or reference for the boots!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By el nino
Do people really not like or bother to read SHP?
El Nino
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Danny Swygart
I've got a copy of this months FHM and SHP in by briefcase and keep getting them mixed up.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adam Jackson
Its a jobs mag, with occasional other stuff.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Aston
At the risk of being told off for being dull....
I didn't really like the boots.
I do read most of the "front bit" of SHP and usually find some good articles.
I don't often read the "back bit" these days
Sorry
Heather
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By el nino
El Nino finds SHP a cracking good read, although rather lacking in humour.
I have already offered the editor my services and I am hoping to make El Nino's Column a regular feature ( Little Nino is working on a few articles as I write ).
As for the boots - I have it on good authority that they are being worn by a man in the photograph. Does this put anybody off?
El Nino
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
One things for sure, irrespective of gender, with heels like that, bean bags to protect a fall are not an option as they are likely to split or burst.
Perhaps a harness of some sort is required.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steven bentham
Its disgusting that the rest of the 'kit' was not inside.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By el nino
Bean bags?
El Nino
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Ah well! one knows the quality of a magazine when it forgets to remove the "Lorem ipsum" and put the right content into the contents box on the index page..Wots worse they have mis-spelled Cicero's narrative that really is unforgiveable. Still Latin is meant to be dead and no one realises that it is spelt wrongly- or perhaps they do and they are not as sad as I am in commenting on it.
For the real buffs this is where it was derived from
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum."
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alex Ryding
Aut insanit homo, aut versus facit?
As for a man in the boots, well in this world of metrosexual, as long as he trained to walk in the boots whilst juggling the bean bags...
Exigo a me non ut optimis par sim sed ut malis melior
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.