Posted By PS Can anyone help with the query below from a friend, I've been assigned to look at the use of mercury in a factory. We use manometers and thermometers and there have been a few issues in the past. One in which the manometer board fell over creating a mercury swimming pool in the factory. Does anyone have a sample risk assessment of mercury in the workplace that I could "reference" for my own risk assessment.

Posted By Bill Elliott Just a few thoughts to guide your assessment. Manometers usually contain mercury in glass, which if dropped will break and release the mercury. Mercury is covered by COSHH and is listed in EH402002 (though not in new version) with an exposure limit of 0.025mg/m3. If released into environment risk of inhalation and skin absorbtion, accumulates in the body - targeting central nervous system ("mad as a hatter" came from the use of mercury in the manufacture of top hats). There are disposal considerations to be taken into account - a spillage kit ought to be available in the immediate vicinity and persons trained to use it. There suitable digital alternatives now available that do not have the same "human error" element of observer bias on taking readings. Hope that is helpful (excuse the rambling)

Posted By Frank Hallett Good morning Rod & everyone. I bet loads of people are now actively distancing themselves from this posting. It's strange how something that may be presented as inoffensive when verbal and face to face can change it's intent and meaning when written, isn't it? The question of the manometers still has some further issues that could be considered however. It is identified that there is insufficient room to directly accomodate any of the traditional alternatives, but there are modern tecno-electronic devices available that do the same job without all the hassle of having any mercury or water at all; have you considered any of these? Frank Hallett

Posted By PS Thanks to all who took the time to read, comment and send information it is much appreciated.... ..I did however find the 'sweaty sock' comment derogatory (even though said in fun) and would support moderator involvement in future cases. Thanks again, PS

Posted By Frank Hallett Afternoon folks! PS, if you actually produce a workable alternative for your problem, would you share it with us; either personally or on this forum please. It's entirely selfish as I may need to revisit this wheel myself. Frank Hallett