Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 16 June 2005 18:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nigel We are looking at defining competency for safety critical jobs and some are easier than others e.g we can say all locations will have at least one person qualified to say Nebosh Nat Cert , manual handling trainers will be both trained trainers and have undergone accredited external manual handling training. Then we get to maintenance - all staff who undertake this have the appropriate pieces of paper e.g. city & guilds , but what about their managers / supervisors who will hand out the work or employ contractors ? - do we need e.g electrical engineers (do they need to do CPD?) we rely on these people to know the regulations etc , but a recent incident indicated this was not the case. How do any of you address this ? All advice welcomed.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 17 June 2005 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Hi Nigel; not a popular question then? I would have contacted you direct but was unable to do so. However, for starters, you will need to conduct a thorough training needs analysis to determine exactly what specific qualifications and other qualities that your employer considers essential to being competent in all posts. If you wish to contact me direct I shall be happy to discuss how I may be able to help you. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#3 Posted : 17 June 2005 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh An interesting one this. I have now got a "Competence" validation scheme going on site as part of our COMAH process. I think it is important to differentiate between "trained" and "competent". Essentially, being trained isn't enough; you need to be able to DEMONSTRATE that the training is being put into action. Many people think that "trained" = "competent", and this is not necessarily so.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 17 June 2005 12:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert. Agree with Garyh. We train to a level of competence and standard that is acceptable, then continued improvement "kicks" in by peer supervision (trained experienced and competent) to SOP standards for a period. Our staff are all confident at hazard recognition in the changing environment and do respond safely.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.