Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 24 June 2005 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graeme Hughson Occupational hygienists and safety professionals should be concerned about the filtration capacity of organic vapour filtering respirators. I believe that the usual advice to the wearer is to replace the filter if chemical odours can be detected when in use. However, I'm sure most would agree that it would be useful for people to have a better prediction of filter lifespan. IOM is currently investigating how organic filter cartridges for full and half mask RPE are used in the workplace. One of the important issues we are investigating is the effective filter life in real-life workplace situations. This would include processes where workers are required to use activated carbon filter cartridges in order to control their exposures to organic vapours. If you are connected with a company which uses organic filter cartridges to control workplace exposure, this is your chance to get some free advice and a quantitative assessment of the organic vapour RPE programme. IOM will supply the filter cartridges, which will be the exact type used by each company taking part in the study. If anyone is interested in participating, please reply to me off-list. Further details about IOM and the work we do can be obtained from our website at www.iom-world.org Graeme Hughson graeme.hughson@iomhq.org.uk
Admin  
#2 Posted : 24 June 2005 19:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman I think most people who have had even a minimum technical training in the use of cartridge respirators will know that odour breakthrough cannot possibly be relied on as an indicator of cartridge life. As the poster says (and I am sure this is a commercial approach) cartridge life can only be estimated from knowing cartridge capacity for the known contaminants, the actual peak and mean concentrations of those contaminats compared to the acceptable exposure limits, combined with any possible "poisoners" for the absorbant in the work environment AND the breathing rate of the wearer (hard, hot, heavy work will increase lung throughput and thus tend to reduce cartridge life). Cartridge respirators should not be relied on if concentration excedes 50% of the exposure limits. And then throw them away at the end of the shift.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 June 2005 15:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graeme Hughson Just to clarify things, this is NOT a commercial exercise. This work is an HSE funded research project carried out by IOM, which is an independent research centre (with charity status in Scotland). We are looking for companies to contribute by participation in the study. As I indicated, participants will benefit from the study by gaining some useful advice and obtaining a quantatative measure of filter capacities from a range of samples. I am not looking to sell anyone anything. Please get in touch if you can help.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 June 2005 17:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Graeme, thankyou. The non commercial aspect could have been expressly clarified in your original posting Merv
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.