Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dee
I would be grateful if members could advise me of their opinions/experiences of the two systems.
I am aware that 18001 is yet to become a certified system and that the BSC audit does appear to have more commercial benefits but before I contact the organisations I wanted to hear of any 'real-life' experiences.
The company I am looking at this for is quite young, with about 25 personnel but expanding. It is a design company with a workshop facility within the energy sector.
Any comments/thoughts gratefully received.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Lewis
First, I have no experience of the BSC 5* audit, however I was involved heavily in the set up and auditing of an OHSAS 18001 system, both as an internal auditor and being audited by SGS Yardsley. OHSAS does concentrate the mind and help ensure that all your systems and records are in place; also, I would expect it to be a much deeper assessment than a 5* audit. Certainly the first time we were audited SGS ripped us apart on many issues, mainly revolving around record keeping.
An advantage of OHSAS 18001 is that if you already have ISO9001 and ISO14001 you can be audited as an Integrated Management System. There is a cost saving over having the three done seperately.
Finally, ISO's 9001, 14001and OHSAS have that little section about demonstrating "Continuous Improvement". Isn't that what we are all supposed to be striving for? I'm not sure, but I suspect that 5* is a one off inspection, renewable next year at further cost. This is where someone from BSC shoots me down in flames I guess.
Cheers
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Craythorne
Many years ago when I worked in enforcement a colleague and I served 14 Improvement Notices on a company that had a 3 Star Award within the BSC's 5 Star Award scheme.
Now, as a contract insurance surveyor I would give greater value to an OHSAS18001 certificate than a BSC 5 Star Award.
This is purely my opinion and I don't wish to annoy BSC or any other similar organisation as they do a very good job within the field of H&S but you have to ask yourself if an organisation who is looking to get a regular income from you (and who is not subject to UKAS scrutiny) is likely to be as intrusive and thorough as an 18001 audit certification body?
Perhaps it is just me being a bit cynical and suspicious.
Regards,
Paul Craythorne
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Has anyone ever got LESS than three stars ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jay Joshi
I worked with BSC from 1998 to 2003. All I can say is that as is the case with several organisations, they move on and become more professional and customer focused.
The BSC of today is not the BSC of the past. Just look how far it has gone in its new Diploma on Occupational Health and Safety management. The "new" Diploma has got QCA & IOSH accreditation and IIRSM recognition.
The same applies to all its services.
Also, there is no proof that organisations with OHSASA 18001 certification have never received some form of enforcement action from the HSE.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jeffh
I must agree with Jay, I find the BSC a very professional organisation. We have run with the 5* audit for the past five years and it has helped us identify areas for improvement every year.
It is difficult to compare the 5* audit with the 18001 standard as the 5* is exactly what it says it is, an audit of your management system. We are 9001 and 14001 certificated and our H&S management system has fitted quite nicely into a fully integrated system.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Beveridge
Merv,
Yep!
We are the holder of 1 star.
It was part of the requirement when I joined the business in Feb 05 that they had an audit carried out to give me a bench mark to improve from.
(I was surprised they reached 1 star)
Suffice to say, plenty of room for improvement.
Regards
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Craythorne
Jay, I don't recall making any comment that OHSAS18001 certificate holding companies never receive enforcement action.
Jeff, you state that the 5 Star audit is an audit of the management system. What do you think an OHSAS18001 audit is then?
Regards,
Paul Craythorne
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
BSC paper work audit trail exercise etc etc but is that how it is really done?? or is it a PR exercise to get on clients lists???
Quality/Env/Safety systems - same thing really unless you are externally audited and I mean audited not a couple of hours going through paperwork will the 'real' value which a company puts on safety etc
Does a BSC or ISO auditor sit in on a safety meeting with the shop floor? suggest not! Auditors are kept away from anyone or anything which may be seen as a non-compliance, I understand the reasons for this but it is not really the 'TRUE' ethos and picture of how management really view safety!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Andy, congratulations on the 1 star. Where are you now ?
And Jim Tye still owes me a gin and tonic.
Auditors take hours on-site wading through the paperwork, never allowed to hear about controversial areas ? Then they are not doing their job. We get the paperwork and wade through it BEFORE we go on site. On-site is reserved for face-to-face interviews. Senior management, union reps, managers, H&S staff, supervisors and employees. If you have done the paperwork then you already know where some of the "controversial areas" could be. And you have the background on incidents/analyses/causes/action plans (if any). This gives you credible talking points and opening questions. However, my favourite opening question (been using it for the last 15 years) is "what have YOU done recently to improve safety in YOUR area ?" (tell me about your strengths, not your weaknesses)
The answers can tell you a lot about the depth of the H&S programme and will lead them, quite naturally, to telling you about their problems (controversial areas) which you can probe in detail with the H&S group (or person)
By the way, interviews are strictly informal. No notes taken, no checklist filled out. If you have to do a checklist then save it for the end of the session, fill it out with the interviewee, with suitable apologies. (sorry, have to do this, but I'm not writing down your name, it's just statistics)
Where's my glass of wine ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Ballard
There are some interesting comments here that warrant a reply. Firstly to John Lewis, don’t be afraid to make constructive criticisms of us, we only shoot down blimps.
Secondly, to Paul Craythorne, on your own admission you are allowing an experience of many years ago to colour your judgement of things today. Are you suggesting that most 18001 audit certification bodies are not hungry for profits? Think again! The BSC is a charity, and has no shareholders to worry about. Do have a good look at us and see what we have achieved.
The BSC Five Star Audit today is aimed only partly at compliance: a large part of the auditor’s report is devoted to ways of improving performance, and this is true even for those organisations that achieve five stars. As a matter of interest for Merv Newman, (who doesn’t seem to know the difference between a G&T and a glass of wine), there are many companies that get less than three stars, including no stars at all. But we do not present certificates to companies with no stars, so you won’t see them in the newspapers. And that is another important point, because the grading system is an encouragement to organisations to climb up the ladder – continuous improvement. The publicity that we can achieve is itself a means of making companies work harder to improve themselves. Five Star organisations can compete for a Sword of Honour, and that really does turn the spotlight on to safety performance.
Finally, a major insurer has accepted that our system reduces risk, and as a result companies that are successful in our audit can get reductions of up to 25% from their premiums, potentially a saving of far more than the cost of the audit.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Lewis
This thread has developed a lot in the last few days from Dee's original question. Personally I now think that the 5* audit may be the way for my present company to go. I experience a lot of Director level inertia on Safety. This filters down to the Managers who are obsessed with product out the door figures; it keeps us all in a job but it is certainly not the B'all and end all.
Perhaps a 5* audit might give me some amunition to take to the board to highlight their shortcomings, as well as give me a bench mark and an independent audit. Once my probation period is up I will have a little more freedom. The last time I even mentioned an external audit the answer was "We have you now, isn't it your job to do all that?"
David, thanks for the comment about blimps, I don't put items on the Forum very often so it is encouraging.
Last item, does the number of spelling mistakes in the Forum have any correlation with the annoyance/anger of the writer to the subject? Blimp question I think.
Cheers John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Craythorne
David, I have not let my experience of many years ago colour my judgement. I was simply stating my opinion which is not necessarily right and not necessarily wrong it is just my opinion.
Of course 18001 certification bodies work for a profit and there may well be some better than others. However, the fact that OHSAS18001 may at some point become an ISO standard and the fact that it integrates quite well with ISO14001 and ISO9001 means that it is my preferred method.
I am sure that the BSC 5 Star award is a very robust audit process and as I stated in my first response I do not wish to annoy or upset anyone. I merely put my opinion on here for the originator of the posting to read and take on board or discard as he sees fit.
Regards,
Paul Craythorne
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jeffh
Paul
I would say OHSAS18001 is a standard to be audited against, not an audit system.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Craythorne
Jeff,
Once a company has implemented the requirements of OHSAS18001 they are then audited against that standard which, in effect, is an audit of the company's management system.
Just because the BSC have a raft of audit questions doesn't mean that it is any different. The question set that they use must be derived from a standard against which they can benchmark.
Regards,
Paul Craythorne
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve e ashton
Just to widen the discussion slightly:
Some years ago I did a lot of research to find the most suitable audit methodology for my employing organisation.
At that time I opted for the RoSPA QSA system, largely because it was based (very) closely on the (then new) HS(G)65.
A subsequent employer - did the same exercise - came up with the same answer, although the reasoning was slightly different.
In both cases, the QSA scheme (although expensive to buy into initially) proved its worth, and gave excellent results in terms of objective, benchamarkable, sustainable improvement and attitude change in senior management.
Since those days, I have developed bespoke protocols for a number of organisations. I still believe that the QSA system has a lot to offer most organisations. And no, I don't get any kickback from RoSPA for saying this.
I suspect most 18001 audit protocols will be fairly similar to the QSA protocol - after all, you ask about POPIMAR one way, you ask about it any way...
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Yes, 18001 is a standard to be audited against, and yes, I also use QSA and like it very much, it's been updated to reflect much of 18001 while still retaining its core requirement of compliance with HSG65,
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.