Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stuart Woolfries
In my office there are a number of desks used by more than one individual.
Is it necessary to conduct a VDU assessment for each officer each time they are at a desk?
How should this scenario be managed from the point of view of VDU assessments?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Philip Purcell
Hi,
i don't think as risk assessment needs to be done for each individual. Once the items are adjustable at the work station then they should suit all. Each person needs to be made aware of how to adjust all.
regards,
philip
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
However, in addition to checking the workstations, there are user/operator-specific issues that will need to be adressed and you will see that the so-called VDU Workstation Check-list provided as Appendix 5 in HSE guidance document L26 gives standard questions for users regarding any problems, discomfort or other symptoms experienced, whether they are taking adequate breaks from the VDU and eyesight testing. You will also need to ensure that records are kept for this aspect of the DSE Regs. Personally, I use one standard check-list and see each user at their workstation in order to cover all these points - but others may not find this practicable and deal with the personal issues separately.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By stevehaigh
I would do an assessment for each individual you can than group together people who may have similar difficulties and point them to certain workstations. Lefthanders/righthanders etc. it could take ages to adjust work stations to suit each and everyone. Then we have manual handling, and maybe new and expectant mothers etc etc. ........
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jason telford
It's simple: carry out a DSE Assessment on each user so they know how to set up a work station in any area
i used to work at a call centre (1400) staff and this issue was not a problem we even brought in an electronic assessment system to save time and money
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
To an extent this issue has been addressed by the 2002 amendments to the DSE regs; as long as the equipment meets the specification laid out in Schedule 1 and sufficient training in its use and adjustment has been given you should be OK, the term 'user' is no longer relevant,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
To follow on from J Knight's point above: although employers are now required to ensure that all DSE workstations meet the requirements of the Schedule to the Regs, the terms 'user' and 'operator' remain strictly defined (and explained on several pages of L26) in as much as further duties are owed to them by the employer (eg under Regs 4, 5, 6 and 7). For this reason they have added the additional questions relevant to users in their standard check-list (as I mentioned earlier).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Ken,
it's true that 'user' and 'operator' are still defined, but I don't really see their applicability in most circumstances; given that the equipment has to comply with Schedule 1, and given that HASAWA and all dependent legislation requires suitable and sufficient training blah blah to be given in order to reduce risk, the process of categorising people as users or operators seems largely a paper exercise. It seems to me the questions now are 1) does the equipment comply with the schedule? and 2) does any employee using it know how to do so safely?
Under the old regime an assessment was only required where users/operators had been identified, now we have to do an assessment irrespective,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor
John,
The duty for training and information could also be argued from other legislation but I suppose that the drafters thought it best to still clarify it with specific regard to DSE. There is, of course, also the specific duty for the information to include health aspects of DSE use. However the duties for providing breaks from the screen, providing eye and eyesight tests and, where necessary, 'special corrective appliances' only relate to users - making the distinction necessary (unless you choose to provide these for everyone who ever looks at a screen or touches a keyboard). How the employer chooses to discharge these duties will vary but the HSE obviously see some benefit in keeping these items within their check-list.
So to clarify for some other readers: the distinction of users and non-users is not required for assessing the actual workstations generally; but the distinction is required with regard to other duties under the DSE Regs - which may necessitate further action, assessment, medical or eye checks, etc.
Personally, I regret the 'hijacking' of the term 'user' by the drafters (presumably to avoid having to keep typing 'habitual and significant'!).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adrian Watson
Dear All,
Try to defend yourself if you havn't assessed the workstation for an individuals.
Individuals are rather unfortunately unique, whilst furnture isn't! Furntiture is designed to fit 90% of people. This means it doesn't fit the tallest 5% of men and the smallest 5% of women if it has been designed correctly. Unfortunately this isn't the case so the furniture may not fit 15-20 of users.
Regards Adrian Watson
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.