Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 July 2005 17:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tim Someone has designed and built a piece of work equipment to lever and lift paving slabs, and want permission to use it. How/should it be given clearance? Would it come under LOLER and PUWER? I have an idea where to go with this but I am after some independant opinions. Seems like a can of worms to me
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 July 2005 21:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle People normally providing their own tools for work need to have them checked routinely by their employers to ensure they are in satisfactory condition and safe to use. In many instances tools are 'invented by employees (a certain janitor and the term hoover comes to mind) that adequately serve the purpose intended and are as safe to use if no safer than other tools or methodology employed. I would suggest the right course of action would be risk assessment and comparisson with other types of similar equipment in the terms of reasonable practicallity... Provided the tool works, is safe, and does not cause other hazards to be raised in use that cannot be controlled by other methods or use of PPE, I guess the tools is OK. Who knows, perhaps the chap is on a winner and you should ask him to remember your risk evaluation when he makes it big-time... Stuart
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 July 2005 08:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Daniel If is is a powered device it is required to meet the EC "Essential Safety Requirements" of the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regs 1992 and be CE-marked, whether it is a one-off or commercially-produced. This would require extensive work and evidence but woudl be deemed to then comply with PUWER. The LOLER only apply if this is primarily a lifting device as opposed to a levering or transportation device. This is vague but you should look at the risk of injury should something fall.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 28 July 2005 08:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lynne Ratcliffe Tim, We have had to build and manufacture a number of items over the years to do a variety of things ie lifting, load bearing, shifting and splitting. We have approached our insurance company/companies who have 'experts' that have given us advice to ensure that we comply with PUWER, LOLER, CE marking etc. That way we have ensured compliance and insurance cover in one hit. Good luck,
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.