Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 August 2005 16:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jenny R Harris Has anyone some wise words to impart on this one please? In-house maintenance staff within a housing association environment have experienced two instances (in the same week) of acid reacting with water (as it tends to!!) and blowing back causing damage to tenants belongings. We can and have addressed the obvious issues - competence, communication etc. But going back to basics - is there anyone out there working for a similar organisation (or drain unblockers ltd.) consider this product unsuitable for commercial use or just plain useless.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 August 2005 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Cr8r Jenny I thought most drain unblockers were based on caustic soda (sodium hydroxide). Don't get me wrong, this is still nasty stuff (has to be to do the job - dissolving fats, hair etc), however it doesn't react with water, so would appear from what you say to be a little better than sulphuric acid. This isn't my field though, so perhaps an expert will offer further advice.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 August 2005 17:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope I'm not sure of the chemical make up, but a similar product called blockbuster was used by a council plumber, by mistake on a copper waste it blew back, hit the ceiling and gave him acid burns. The HSE inspector castigated the council for not being aware that councils in the vicinity had long ago banned this product due to the risk. I think it was the subject of an improvement notice.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 August 2005 19:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney This is a tricky one, it is generally around 93% Sulphuric Acid and one of its first jobs was external 'soak aways' to melt (so to speak) leaves and the like so gutters could flow. It is highly dangerous used in the incorrect manner and there are many restrictions concerning its use, i.e. storage, skin/eye contact, who is trained to use it, respiratory, correct SDS's, etc etc etc, I would look to find a more suitable product or find another way to unblock (jetting etc) it must never ever be mixed with anything else, residue of previous chemicals can be a serious problem, the gas is not nice, trust me, I know. Elimination of the product has to be the number 1 priority (all in my humble opinion) Charles
Admin  
#5 Posted : 31 August 2005 13:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter We had an incident similar to the one Chris Pope describes, but escaped the wrath of the HSE. In that instance we believe the reaction was made so much more violent because the tenant had tried other products (including caustics). Apply COSHH principles and get rid of the products altogether - you can never be sure what the tenant has already put down the sink and there are 2 mutually exclusive products on the market. Consider using rodding & water pressure instead?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.