Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 September 2005 20:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David P. Johnson Hello, Has anybody had an experience, or knowledge for that matter, of ways to integrate an organisation-wide policy statement for H&S, Environment and QUality Management? If so, would you mind sharing your knowledge? Thanks!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 September 2005 10:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly Would also be very interested to hear from anyone about this matter. Regards Jennifer
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 September 2005 15:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer The first question that comes to mind is why would you want a single integrated policy statement? Itis quite feasable to have a number of high level company policies driving a single integrated management system with each part of the system delivering one pr more policies. It could be more to your advantage to have separate policies because they can be updated easier, are clearer statements and avaoid confusion and ambiguity.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 September 2005 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham We have one, but between two divisions rather than throughout the entire organisation and that's only because they do work for the same Client and that the work they do is very similar. but the safety management systems are different because of the different structures and the instances that the work is done, e.g. one does work either as a PC or on a Construction site and the other on a fully operational trading site, giving rise to very different working environments and priorities as far as safety goes What I'm getting at is that where the objectives are the same then the policy 'statement' may be similar but as the previous post mentioned the actual policies may be very different depending on the work that they actually do and the structure of the individual group, e.g. arrangements, organisation, etc. So where the policies are the same the management system may be very different. I don't even know if that makes sense :-b
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 September 2005 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Smiff We have an IMS, but have stayed, for now, with a stand alone QA and a combines SHE policy statement. This seems to be a position our stakeholders are more comfortable with. We are making progress with risk-based quality etc. but it'll be a while before our clients will be able to see past the traditional compartments, and we find we actually have more work to describe our systems in say, a bid document that requires a certain structure, to a template created in the years before IMSs. The most important thing is it has got got work and be meaningful to it's intended audience.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.