Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 September 2005 13:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Clive Cooper An employee works in an area where eye protection is mandatory. He has been issued with prescription safety glasses, and he wears them. His current pair are bifocal, but he has just had a new prescription. This time, for his own pair, he has chosen to have varifocal lenses. He has asked if his new safety glasses can be varifocal. As far as I am aware there is no legal reason to provide the more expensive option, and in fact some policies that can be found on the Internet state "no varifocals". Has anyone else had this choice to make? What did you decide and why?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 September 2005 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alex Ryding Our policy if for single vision lenses only. We do offer bifocal and varifocal lenses but the employee pays the additional cost. We designate tasks requiring safety glasses opposed to rooms requiring glasses so single vision is suitable for the task. If you cover the room then you may well have to offer bi/ vari as standard.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 07 September 2005 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Richards In the Company that I work for our policy is quite clear. An employee is responsible for presenting himself to work with eyesight (corrected or otherwise) adequite to carry out the work that he is employed to do. If the Risk Assessment for the activity requires his sight to be protected, then the PPE is provided in the way of impact resistant Screens/Googles that will fit over the top of his glassess. Only in very exceptional circumstances would prescription Safety Glasses be paid for and I have yet to come across a justifiable case.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 07 September 2005 14:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Hi Clive, You need to take into account the nature of the work involved before making a judgement. Consider what tasks are undertaken and is there a need for the person's eyesight to be of a specific standard across the whole range of vision? i.e is it close up work, distance work, or is it just normal vision that is needed. If it is a whole range then you need to consider what is reasonably practicable. It is difficult to state specific requirements because the circumstances may vary widely. I suggest you revisit the risk assesment and try to identify what hazards are likely to arise from not providing varifocals. If the risk is unacceptable then I'm afraid you will most likely have to pay up.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 September 2005 14:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Adams We provide what the user normally wears. We purchase vouchers from a certain nationwide high street retailer. Varifocal and bifocal cost the same.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.