Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 September 2005 14:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy P We have an employee who has been off for a couple of weeks (and has been receiving medical help) following what amounts to a nervous breakdown. The breakdown was mainly due to very bad personal circumstances and recent experiences, however on talking to her she has mentioned concerns about work stresses (although they had not been brought up via the official channels prior to the breakdown). How does one decided whether this absence counts as work-related and therefore reportable under RIDDOR? Although work stress could be cited as a factor, it would really only be a small contributory factor in the big scheme of things, so a difficult one to call. Any ideas?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 13 September 2005 14:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eden Work related stress is not a disease. So therefore is not reportable under RIDDOR. Stress is a causal factor not a sympton. Because I am suffering from stress I have come out in a rash. The HSE web site have got some very good information on stress in the work place. Another good source of information is the ACAS web site
Admin  
#3 Posted : 13 September 2005 16:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan I agree with Mark that stress is not a disease in RIDDOR terms. Your account suggests that the employee is approaching, or has reached, a stage of extreme stress known as 'burnout'. So, there's a decision to be made about the right combination of adjusted work design and personal support required to enable her to achieve 'graduated' return to work. Otherwise, you could well end up with a much more complex condition and possibly a claim for personal injury damages for failure to adequately control her present level of risk.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 September 2005 12:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Over three day rule is for an accident at work, illness isn't an accident; whether stress is a disease or not it isn't notifiable under RIDDOR and absence due to a notifiable disease isn't reportable, just the condition itself, John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.