Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 September 2005 20:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly For those of you that have seen the film then I'm not talking about the scene where the rather lovely William Baldwin and the starlet of the show get up to some, ah-hem,....well let's say shenanigans on the back of a fire engine, but enough of that and onto the serious question. I have just seen a Fire Warden/Marshall (what is the difference between the two names??) training video in which the presenter demonstrates how to carefully feel for heat coming through a door, whilst crouching down, and then, if no heat is felt, to carefully open the door to see that the room is clear. Is this accepted practice to teach Fire Wardens/Marshalls? General comments and thoughts on this procedure would be welcome as I have some reservations and am curious to see if they are shared. Regards Jennifer
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 September 2005 22:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC I could point you in the direction of a good site, which would show various situations where 'backdraft', 'flashover' or 'fire gas ignitions' could occur. Feeling for heat in some cases would not give a clue as to what's going behind that door. Fire Wardens or Marshalls should be only given basic 'first aid' fire fighting i.e use of fire extinguishers for single use or to assist escape if trapped after or whilst doing their searches. Training should not be given to allow for searching out a possible fire, but an occassion where a knowledge of what to look for would be of use is if it was suspected that the escape route was involved in fire. You've got to remember that the these people are usually the last ones out so if the escape routes are not straight forward then they need all the assistance available. Here's the site address : www.firetactics.com/FLASHOVER.htm Hope it helps.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 September 2005 22:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Forgot to mention - If you click around the various links you'll find some good details, be able to download some documents and see some great action videos. It will open your eyes. Enjoy
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 September 2005 09:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Depends on how you want to define the roles as i do not recollect any specific formalised definitions. I tend to use wardens to check areas and Marshalls to control assembly points but as long as everyone understands what they are to do you can even call them horses and elephants if you wish. There was only one situation where I have trained for this, that was in care homes if the fire alarm is triggered in a zone but a fire is not visible in the common areas, suggesting it is in a resident's room. Staff do need to check behind closed doors when there is known to be a resident in the room. Feeling for temperature and any odour of smoke is then useful in deciding how to evacuate. The hard part is ensuring that all other residents are clear and safe before entry is attempted. Usually by then the Fire Service has arrived, my contacts with them suggest this is how they would wish it to be approached. It still does have risks however. I would not want a situation where it is routinely used however as flashover is lethal in its effects. Bob
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 September 2005 09:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackw. Hi a very difficult issue. We have a number of residential homes and indeed one of the videos we show at our in house fire warden training does demonstrate how to make some basic checks re fire in a room. However, we make it very clear to staff in these units that if they suspect a fire behind a door, even in a room containing a resident, they must not open the door. To do so would/could have them “roasted” and the fire spread out into other areas much faster than it would if the door was left closed. A difficult choice for staff I agree but we take the view that the bigger picture re the other residents and staff must take precedent. Also in most cases if the fire is raging in a room the resident will probably have perished. As I say not an easy choice for staff.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 September 2005 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Just to extend JackW words a bit. The smoke is also very toxic to the frail elderly and it does not even require the fire itself to be particularly large for fatal consequences to occurr. He is also absolutely right - leave opening any suspect door to the fire services you are unlikely to be able to help. Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 September 2005 16:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Apart from the film and whatever people get up to on the back of the waggon, backdraft can be very very nasty. I was taught, by a 99 year old (well maybe it was just heat exposure) fireman to use ALL of your senses before you opened that door : Look at it - is it distorted, bowing, bubbling ? Feel it - is it hot or vibrating ? Listen - any interesting noises ? Smell it - anything burning behind it ? I can't remember any specific reason for tasting a door before you open it, but maybe you can think of one. Actually, the safest method he recommended was to get your mate to open it. Perhaps that's why he lived to 99. Merv
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 September 2005 17:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney C'mon Frank where are you?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 20 September 2005 20:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Good evening all [like the spectre at the feast again!] We've done this one to death [no I really do mean the pun this time] so many times in the last couple of months! Jennifer, there is no technical difference between Marshals, Wardens, Wombles, Humpa-Lumpas or whatever else your employer decides to call thos persons appointed to assist in complying with the current and incoming Fire Legislation by checking that all those who can leave the premises have done so and that the location and reason for nor leaving of those remaining is carried to the Emergency Co-ordinator or Evac Boss within the shortest possible time so that suitable arrangements can be made by those trained to enter, retrieve persons and fight fires can do so knowing that all relevant persons have been accounted for [that's not necessarily the same as removed from the premises!]. If you are training your staff on how to recognise "flashover" and "backdraught" conditions [no -they aren't the same]; then you will have specific reasons to do so, such as the Marshals [sic] having to enter single closed rooms to check the empiness or otherwise of it because the ossupants can't do it themselves. In that case whatever happened to the fire detection and alarm system that should clearly identify the location of the fire? If you find the need to go further and expect your staff to interact with fires or the products of combustion; my advise it to get someone who really does know about it to provide some independant and impartial advice about the structure, training, PPE, supervision and everything else that goes with it. OK Charley? Frank Hallett
Admin  
#10 Posted : 21 September 2005 09:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney Just couldn't have put it quite as technically succinct as you Frank. Still I am renaming the Fire Wardens/Marshals today; "Remember your a Fire Womble, remember your a fire womble!!" yep, sure works for me Frank, never did like being the run o the mill Director. They dread coming to my office, wait till I tell em this one.....
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 September 2005 11:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Glad you liked it Charley! What will you call yourself now - Head Monitor? You can read that title so many different ways and monitors are carnivores. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 September 2005 11:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Hallett Just an extra thought - the Humpa-Lumpa title would probably be better reserved for those who are expected to assist mobility challenged persons in evacuation. Frank Hallett
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.