Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 September 2005 11:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JAI I am in the middle of setting up a new risk assessment, a draft copy has been issued and approved by nearly all the managers apart from one, he has come back and asked if we can include a frequency calculation to fit in with the level of risk I have to say after reading some guidance i am a bit lost and do not like the idea of saying an accident will happen every 5yrs or so on I think this will set the wrong example to staff and give a false sense of security. what is wrong with identifying the hazards, rating them (system used impossible, possible, probable) and putting in controls The purpose of the risk assessment is to identify a hazard which is present at all times and put measures in to control it, do we really need to complicate the issue with a frequency rating Please any thoughts ps Does anyone have a frequency calculator i could look at to further my understanding Jai
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 September 2005 12:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pat Burns MIOSH, RSP - SpDipEM - MIQA Jai I have e-mailed you seperate to your posting. Hope this helps a bit.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 September 2005 14:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Petrie the bands you suggest need to relate to some sort of frequency so that people cam unserstand them probable = once per year Probably = every ten years etc. It helps people get a handle on things, especially when judging risk. i.e. 'oh yeah I rememmber one of them a few years ago, I would say it is probable then' I would stongly advise against using impossible as a definition though, try highly unlikely. If it is truly impossible, it shouldn't be on your risk assessment.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.