Posted By R Joe I think the key point here, which is common to all types of risk assessment, is not so much 'practical' as 'valuable'. One of the common weaknesses of many assessments that I have seen has been not to include those doing the task (whether TU or not). This results in a weak assessment that (1) misses key points about how the task is really done, (2) good suggestions for improvements and (3) buy in which is vital for effective implementation. My suggestion would be to jointly prioritise the tasks likely to represent the most significant risks and then focus on these initially with employee input. Maybe even get really radical by inviting a member of management to sit in on one of the assessments so that they can hopefully see that it is a worthwhile collaborative process and that its better to do one assessment in this way than large numbers in isolation which are then 'given to the employees'. I appreciate that there may be management / TU aspects here, so focus on which employees can best contribute. Hope this helps. Regards RJ