Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 September 2005 13:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Hanley Your views on a situation that has arose at work would be appreciated. I recently started work for a property holding and development group. The structure of the group consists of the parent holding company and a number of smaller limited companies trading under seperate names and types of buisness. My problem is that the Managing Director insists that one safety policy is sufficient for the whole group, but i disagree with this and insist that each company has its own individual policy detailing procedures for managing health and safety in that company. Any opinions are much appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 September 2005 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert. So the MD wants to be soley responsible and accepts all risk for all the other groups activities associated with the parent company. I agree with you, the sattelite companies should have their own policy statment deriving from the generic group one.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 September 2005 13:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh I see no problem with a "group" safety policy (very common in big or multi site/ multi national organisations) however you need to define local "arrangements" ie responsibilities.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 September 2005 13:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Longworth I work for a large multinational company that amongst other things manufactures central heating boilers. We have a group policy statement that sets out the overall aims of the company with regard to managing health and safety and similarly a "generic" organisational section. When it comes to the arrangements section we have a group set of minimum standards that forms the basis on which each individual company within the group can build eg different sites will have their own SSWs or procedures for dealing with emergencies etc. We find that this ensures that the safety philosophy is a common one but allows flexibility in the way individual sites manage particular isues.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 September 2005 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By R Joe Michael, some additional thoughts. Underlying your question is the issue of the governance of health and safety and what this should look like in your case. As the other contributors have highlighted, the issues of where respective group / local and also individual responsibilities sit, to what extent, how they could (or should) be discharged, and the associated advantages and disadvantages of these things are all part of this. In my view, there is no universal model and the degree of control that the holding company exerts over its subsidiaries, and how this is achieved is important here, as well as issues such as common directors (or not). If you’ve not done so already, I’d talk to your company secretary about this to get a full understanding of your particular set up. The recent consultation on Corporate Manslaughter is also worth thinking about with regard to the issue of culpability of parent companies and where ‘management control’ sits. Documented governance arrangements are important, and done well will help turn responsibilities into what are even more important – accountabilities - at both a group and local level. The safety policy(ies) should reflect the agreed approach to health and safety governance as well as confirming (hopefully) the organisation’s beliefs and commitments with regard to health and safety. Generally, with separate subsidiaries that are limited companies in their own right, an overall group policy supplemented by more specific local policies would tend to be the approach. I’m not an advocate of including all ‘organisation and arrangements’ in policies, and would outline them in the policies along with where the detail can be found at both a group and local level. Hope this helps. Regards RJ.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 September 2005 21:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Hanley Thank you for the information and views it is very helpful.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.